>> 5440674 (pb)
The North Korean satellites are not in geosynchronous orbit. And they don't hover over any location on the planet. They make a complete orbit every 1.5 hours, passing over (or near) every point on the planet twice a day (once going north to south, another time going south to north.)
There's a lot of misinformation in the Epoch Times article.
"Another unusual feature of the North Korean satellites is that they orbit from south to north. Normally, weather satellites go from north to south to help obtain a sun-synchronous orbit—to observe conditions on earth under regular sun conditions—which can be desirable for earth observation satellites."
This is mixing up two completely different concepts.
For ICBMs the trajectory matters. Radar fences tend to be looking north, at the direct path for a Soviet attack. Something launched in the other direction, coming in from the south, would be less visible. That's likely what the author was aware of when comparing directions.
This is totally irrelevant for an orbiting satellite in a polar orbit. Since the satellite will - every day - approach from both north and south, on a well established and known trajectory.
What does matter for an Earth observation satellite in a sun synch orbit is the time of day the satellite passes over, as this affects local weather and shadows for imagery. And that is sometimes defined in terms of when the satellite is going in a particular direction (the northbound or southbound pass of the day.)
Another reason the n vs s direction does not matter for an orbiting satellite, is if the satellite orbit is at the right altitude for an EMP, it would fire by surprise on a known trajectory. There is NO element of surprise to be masked by taking a path that evades radars (unlike an ICBM).
Anyway - there is real info in the article, but unfortunately it's mixed with lots of stuff that is simply mixed up and not accurate or relevant. Read with a critical filter.