Anonymous ID: 492843 Feb. 28, 2019, 11:49 p.m. No.5445290   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5298 >>5307 >>5315 >>5327 >>5474 >>5581 >>5666 >>5809

>>5445244

Let's figure it out.

Whoever it was, it was somebody who benefits from a rogue puppet state with which to threaten the world.

>BO is implicated by name by Q

>Q mentions the pallets of cash; money for nuclear enrichment/R&D? BO funding it?

>hostage component could easily be cover for an exchange of cash or materials

If Obama is implicated, then his secretary of State is implicated-HRC. Naturally, since Uranium one is largely her scandal. She's tied to Bill, who in turn is tied to China through his own treasonous administration. The Democrat party at large is tied to Chinese lobbying and sellouts.

>Q said not to think of one person, think of an entity

If China wanted to extend/expand its power to strike:

>Japan

>the Pacific Coast

>Hawaii

>the Philippines

>anywhere in the South Pacific

>South Korea

without incurring blame for itself on the world stage, the Norks would be good puppets to have. Access to the Sea of Japan, the Pacific at large, etc. and you can avoid responsibility.

If a group of traitors in the USA were to sell out to China, it makes sense. China is a large entity.

 

>>5445254

This seems correct, but China itself is tied to Feinstein, the Clintons, Dems, etc.

 

>>5445256

>Hussein set out to fire tons of generals/admirals during that period to clean house of patriots

No doubt. Biggest threat for a crook.

Anonymous ID: 492843 Feb. 28, 2019, 11:57 p.m. No.5445322   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Wikipedia says that the North Korean nuclear program was begun jointly with the USSR in the 1950's.

Also,

23 May, 2004: The UN atomic agency is reported to be investigating allegations that North Korea secretly sent uranium to Libya when Tripoli was trying to develop nuclear weapons.

Anonymous ID: 492843 March 1, 2019, 12:03 a.m. No.5445343   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5369 >>5413 >>5581 >>5666 >>5674 >>5712 >>5726 >>5809

>>5445315

I wonder exactly where they got the uranium. Wikipedia says the USSR and the Norks began the nuke program jointly. But apparently the first mines were in Korea, too. In 2004, thoughโ€ฆ

28 September, 2004:

>North Korea says it has turned plutonium from 8,000 spent fuel rods into nuclear weapons. Speaking at the UN General Assembly, Vice Foreign Minister Choe Su-hon said the weapons were needed for "self-defence" against "US nuclear threat".

So they claim that they've been using fuel rods. Where did they get them, and is the material they're using really from spent fuel rods?

https://web.archive.org/web/20130425162315/http://americansecurityproject.org/ASP%20Reports/Ref%200072%20-%20North%20Korea%E2%80%99s%20Nuclear%20Program%20.pdf

Anonymous ID: 492843 March 1, 2019, 12:16 a.m. No.5445367   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5420 >>5834

>>5445244

>How did NK obtain Uranium?

Possible answers include spent fuel rods, China, the Russians, and the United States.

>How did Iran obtain Uranium?

Bad actors within and around BO administration? Strzok as envoy.

>Why did BO send billions (in cash and wire) to Iran?

Funding. Grant money? R&D for nuke development?

>Why the cash component?

Not electronically traceable?

>Was the hostage component a cover? For what?

An exchange of something? Smuggling something?

>Could any of the cash component be handed off to other people?

Yes. You could pay them in cash instead of wiring it.

>How many planes carried the cash into Iran?

Not sure. I need to dig on this and it'll probably help with the next questions.

>Did all land in Iran? Did all land in the same location?

Probably not. Q seems to suggest no.

>Why is this relevant?

Because somebody else got cash or materials?

>Who controls NK?

The Kim dynasty.

>Who really controls NK?

>Don't think of a single person.

>Think of a powerful entity.

My bet is on China, but I could be persuaded otherwise.

>Why is this important?

Because somebody else is using NK as a strategic asset.

>Why are wars so important?

Money, control, positioning, resources, and economics? Honestly not sure.

>What does hostage refer to?

Somebody on the world stage or an entity being taken hostage. Possibly NK itself in some weird way.

>Who can be held hostage and controlled by NK having mini nukes?

SK, Japan, and the entire Pacific and the Pacific Coast.

Anonymous ID: 492843 March 1, 2019, 12:34 a.m. No.5445437   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

85 PERCENT OF CATHOLIC DIOCESE EXPERIENCE EMBEZZLEMENT

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-46515908

https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2012/01/las-vegas-priest-gambling-addict-sentenced-prison.html

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/08/08/former-priest-no-prison-time-embezzlement/940131002/

https://kbjr6.com/news/2018/10/03/turtle-lake-woman-sentenced-for-embezzling-800k-from-superior-diocese-church/

 

>In 2007 my Villanova University colleague Robert West and I conducted a study of diocesan financial practices, including incidences of embezzlement. We surveyed diocesan chief financial officers and found that 85 percent of reporting dioceses had experienced embezzlement within the last few years, many more than once.

https://www.uscatholic.org/articles/201701/how-stop-embezzlement-your-parish-30912

 

MONEY MAN

TREASURER

https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/25/australia/cardinal-george-pell-vatican-conviction-intl/index.html

Anonymous ID: 492843 March 1, 2019, 12:48 a.m. No.5445479   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5484 >>5485 >>5489 >>5491 >>5511

>>5445474

>The media blamed it on him.. said he was โ€œterrible dictator.. kills his own familyโ€ but what they were doing was setting the stage. They made him look bad to us here in the US (MsM did) and at same time put the screws to him to do what they wanted and to go along with the plan. THINK HOSTAGE. DEFINE HOSTAGE. They made damn sure he would go along w the plan

Holy shit. So the Kim dynasty itself, as in Kim's family, were ACTUALLY taken hostage by Deep State goons? That would make sense.

I had never made that connection.