Anonymous ID: 884a4a March 1, 2019, 10:10 a.m. No.5449809   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9842 >>9876 >>9896 >>9899 >>9982 >>0104 >>0115 >>0247

>>5449503

I've seen tons of negative stuff on TR on here.

Question: Why?

I've seen a few vids on how he was jailed for trying to expose muzzie pedo shit in UK.

I'm not a follower and would like to know what his sins are.

Just cause everyone else seems down on this dude it doesn't mean crap without some sauce, not anons feels.

Help me understand baker

 

I have followed Tommy Robinson for awhile now and see nothing objectionable--and much admirable--about what he has done: stand up for free speech and dare to talk about Pakistani rape gangs (not "Asian" rape gangs, the pc equivalent).

Anonymous ID: 884a4a March 1, 2019, 10:12 a.m. No.5449842   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9896 >>9982

>>5449809

This is not the baker but the anon who posted on Tommy Robinson's expose of the BBC last bread. Even if Robinson were a total loser, the sting op he did against the BBC is spectacular. Now one or two days old, but the material is dynamic. Deserves more attention, IMO, whatever Robinson's ultimate motivates may be.

Anonymous ID: 884a4a March 1, 2019, 10:28 a.m. No.5450100   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0132 >>0227 >>0353

>>5449876

I understand that people might think all kinds of things. But without sauce, all of that is just conjecture. And look how such conjecture plays right into the Soros open borders agenda. Why would a person not be skeptical of such unsauced claims?

 

I must point out that POTUS is also very pro-Israel. Is he also a Zionist?

 

>>5449938

Man, are you right about the UK polsโ€“and the UK press! They are really vicious and don't care who knows it. When they say horrible things about people, it's easy to think they couldn't say it unless it was at least somewhat true. But they don't know the UK press.

 

Also, a lot of Americans just don't follow what happens in the UK all that closely, don't know that much about Robinson. Makes two things easy:

a. Shills saying he's a zionist (thereby weakening his position)

b. Patriots believing same (because they do not know and really hate Zionists because of baking fuckery and all)

 

>>5449896

Baker, I totally respect your position. No problem, just disagree. Thanks for the response.

 

>>5449896

Ok, how are Robinson's motives not pure? Plz give sauce I can check out. Happy to do the research.

 

>>5449982

I can re-post if you would like to nominate. Will not ask for nomination, up to anons.

Anonymous ID: 884a4a March 1, 2019, 10:40 a.m. No.5450285   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0333

>>5450227

Thanks anon. I'll look at it, although it looks an awful lot like the "muh joos" shill stuff with that kind of cover. Why is this kind of graphic necessary if you have the goods? Not now, though. Can't anyone cite me an article with FACTS to check out? If Robinson is a bad guy, where are all the articles discussing the specifics?

Anonymous ID: 884a4a March 1, 2019, 10:45 a.m. No.5450352   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5450249

This is the same stuff coming from groups like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in London. Major, major campaign starting up that includes us specifically in some cases, but always includes "right-wing conspiracy groups." Major League information warfare.