Anonymous ID: 009d45 March 1, 2019, 11:17 a.m. No.5450808   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0980

>>5450753

Only 2 reasons that there could be an exception made to that rule:

  1. HRC is already in custody-but anons/general public doesn't know.

  2. He gives an exact date because of all the times he's given us disinfo about the dates so (((they))) will likely think this is a false alarm like the rest. Just my thoughts.

Anonymous ID: 009d45 March 1, 2019, 11:28 a.m. No.5450979   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1194

>>5450882

> if Markel is pregnant with William's child (if we're to assume that Hewitt is Harry's father and they need a royal tto father the anti-christ).

 

This would explain the ongoing 'fued' between Kate Middleton & Markle…they've literally been pissed at each other since right after Harry & Meghans wedding; perhaps Kate is pissed because he banged Meghan in order to impregnate her? A stretch, maybe, but it would make sense.

Anonymous ID: 009d45 March 1, 2019, 11:32 a.m. No.5451047   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1114

>>5450980

You may be correct, of course.

I've stopped holding my breath or telling the people around me that I've been trying to redpill when we expect such-and-such to happen…it makes me look like a true tinfoil-hatter and it's also a huge letdown personally.

So I shall wait until there's something to talk about or get my hopes up about again untll I have a solid reason.