Jan 23 (123)
>>HAITI FOCUS
>Why is this relevant?
>What comes next?
>CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE_
Quite timely
Hmmm,
Suspect Able to Outside(Remote) Control
โฆprogrammed by the TV = programmable like a TV
>(1/17/14)
http:// www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/americas-spies-want-edward-snowden-dead
Buzzard feed again
''On the ground, intelligence workers certainly say the damage has been done. The NSA officer complained that his sources had become "useless." The Army intelligence officer said the revelations had increased his "blindness."
"I do my work in a combat zone so now I have to see the effects of a Snowden in a combat zone. It will not be pretty," he said.
And while government officials have a long record of overstating the damage from leaks, some specific consequences seem logical.
"By [Snowden] showing who our collections partners were, the terrorists have dropped those carriers and email addresses," the DOD official said. "We can't find them because he released that data. Their electronic signature is gone."''
>Snowden open source Prism/Keyscore (catastrophic to US Mil v. bad actors (WW) +Clowns/-No Such Agency)
>What I say a class action lawsuit?
>When is it effective?
becomesโฆ
When is it a class action lawsuit?
What I say effective?
or
What I say is it effective?
a class action lawsuit When?
I'll take 1 AND 2
>1. Snowden is an elite computer security expert and the intelligence committee was lied to about his identity.
IC above = NSA
>2. Snowden is an elite computer security expert and the intelligence committee is lying to us about his identity.
IC above = CIA