(repost, updated the graphic showing the [-17] should've been when [-21] was posted)

Anons, it looks like there were "holds" in the countdown

This is what a "hold" is in terms of a rocket launch:

A built-in hold is a period in a launch countdown where the countdown clock is stopped. The hold serves as a milestone in the countdown and may be of a fixed or variable duration.

For example, space shuttle launch countdowns included 7 holds at T-27 hours, T-19 hours, T-11 hours, T-6 hours, T-3 hours, T-20 minutes, and T-9 minutes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Built-in_hold

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/launch/countdown101.html

Thinking logically, Q said [-30] on the 2/9/19.

Then, Q said [-21] on the 2/26/19.

The 26th SHOULD'VE been [-17] (kek)

But it was [-21]

Therefore, there were 4 DAYS THAT WERE HOLDS in the countdown.

The original [0] day of the countdown was 3/11/19.

Now, I think the [0] day of the countdown is 3/19/19

>>5451375

exactly though, I'm not saying anything will happen ON the 19th

I'm saying that's when the countdown ends, simply

you're inferring things that I'm not presenting

>>5451377

agreed

because when the [-30] was posted, the [0] was one day, but with the holds, it got moved back

eyes on

>>5451405

thanks anon

I'll be watching the spacex launch tonight, kek

watched the other one last night

>>5451429

this one is the test of the capsule, we need this shit

we rely on the ruskies for this, and have been for years now

>>5451438

o7

>>5451506

I'm just presenting the countdown itself

there are many theories on what it's counting down to

>>5451543

MUELLER DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE

this countdown [-30] is for Mueller's report

MUELLER DECLAS > OIG > HUBER > ]HUBER[

that's my theory on it

>>5451467

yea no shit, KEK

>>5451924

do you mean the specific days that were a hold?

I implied there are holds because the timeline is off by 4 days

>>5452018

I'm not sure it's exactly like a NASA countdown in those terms

for example, there's no T-30 anyway