Anonymous ID: 425ed0 March 1, 2019, 12:37 p.m. No.5451930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1955 >>1965

Q: The Basics - An Introduction to Q and the Great Awakening

PDF: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082809

 

Is this a good introduction to Q?

Is it "the basics"?

Will it help the public to understand what is going on, or make it more confusing, more intimidating, and less appealing?

What qualities would a good introduction have?

How do we know?

Did this get discussed?

Did the COMMUNITY make this?

Or did some "anon" just put it up and say "here it is".

And then there it was at the top of the board, claming to be "the basics"– when in fact it is very CONVOLUTED.

And it our "the basics" docs are CONVOLUTED, does THAT fact play into any MSM narratives about "Qanon"?

About "the chans"?

About weird, confusing, obscure things that normies flee from?

 

How do you control this movement?

CO-OPT everything, and SUBTLY undermine every place you can?

While maintaining a degree of plausibility?

 

WHO made "the basics" of Q?

How do we know?

It was NOT made by the community.

The videos the board pushes were NOT made by the community.

The images that appear as banners were NOT made by the community.

The community had no input in the creative process.

And we have no idea who or what the "anons" that produce content and push it out to us are.

We just passively accept that "anons" do all this stuff here.

 

But is organic?

It is ALL subtly undermining.

And not-so-subtly controlling narrative…

Anonymous ID: 425ed0 March 1, 2019, 12:40 p.m. No.5451980   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5451948

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Where do they come from?

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

Where do they come from?

Do patriots question this?

Do patriots think for themselves, especially when it is obvious something is amiss?

Or not?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

WAKE UP PEOPLE

FIGHT