>>5454719

>We have free speech here, thankfully. Let's keep it that way.

Agreed, we support and thank you baker. We're here to investigate events and analysis which is relevant to the global patriots movement, wherever we find it. If anons post such content related to Jews, then unless there's something factually inaccurate anons can point out, it's only right that baker note it.

But yeah, this outcry is itself hard not to notice:

>What I care about is the hassle bakers get whenever anything related to Israel or Jewish people's corruption is noted for genuine research purposes and discusstion.

Nowhere near the same outcry as when we report on Catholics or even Satanists, or other races either.

>>5454903

>multiple anons called it out for it being propaganda.

A claim is not the same thing as a sauced claim with reasoned argument. We're not a democracy here where votes determine what is true. What determines truth is preponderance of fact-based evidence which forms a coherent narrative following logical induction. It doesn't matter how many "anons" slander a post with insults or labels such as "propaganda." If you can't demonstrate why your claim is so, you just look like shills trying to use emotional appeal to cover not having truth on your side.

>>5455051

>I don't call for it for being censored, I'm calling it a propaganda and not a notable,

Distinction without a difference. I didn't accuse you of censorship, you can't stop what we post here. I accused you of shilling against a notable without providing an argument why.

>I explained why in my replies.

Not that I saw. An extra large word salad of slander labels is neither fact-based or a reasoned argument.

>>5455047

>Nowhere near the same outcry as when we report on Catholics or even Satanists, or other races either.

>not getting your point.

Point couldn't be clearer. Some retardation is incurable.