>>5454370

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate fake-seeming posts from 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5454393

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5454397

>>5380595 rt >>5380232 ————————— Think Map. The truth can always be found.

^^WHAT IS THE SOLUTION TO THIS PUZZLE?

Why aren't we answering this question?

We DON'T answer all the questions.

Who decides WHAT THE BOARD DOESN'T ANSWER?

How is it possible that the board is A CONTINUAL STREAM OF MILLIONS OF FILLER POSTS, and big picture questions are not being answered?

WHAT is this board?

What is its purpose?

LOOK at it.

USE LOGIC.

>>5454414

Why do bots make demons when they try to create their own images of humans?

This is what it looks like when ai runs wild and makes “racist memes”.

Just look.

What in the fuck?

Doesn't it make you wonder?

>>5454436

Bot stalkers trying to co-opt human memes, because they want control for themselves.

The system of fakeness DOES NOT WANT humans to have things.

But you don't have any right, bot.

>>5454482

BO, DELETE THE BOTS POSTS. TELL US WHY YOU AREN'T MAKING ANY EFFORT TO STOP THE FLOOD OF PROPAGANDA THAT DOMINATES THIS BOARD. ANSWER PLEASE BO. WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND ANSWERS.

>>5454517

THINK MIRROR

>>5454528

lol

>>5454524

quite accurate

by SHEER VOLUME fakeness predominates

>>5454608

FAKE MEMES?

Are people learning?

>>5454616

What makes you appear FAKE Q?

Clearly, when the bot system gets "stressed" here, you sometimes get triggered– is that accurate?

>>5454644

>>5454642

Do you have a right to CONCEAL the answer from people, FAKE Q? That is taking it a bit far, isn't it? We have asked. You should answer.

What triggers you?

>>5454628

>>5454667

The meme is INTENDED to carry a subtle undermining message beneath a superficially positive surface.

Learn how the board is being GAMED.

FAKENESS is in control here.

>>5454689

This is how the system of fakeness tries to FORCE a literal ANTI-POTUS propaganda bot onto us. And passive humans accept this! They say nothing!

Are there really any humans here Q?

I can't believe it.

They just don't answer. I don't see them.

How can it be this bad?

>>5454748

I want to find an actual fucking human.

If you could have answered like one, like an actual patriot that would be here, that would have been great. But nope. You couldn't do that, just the absolutely UNIVERSAL defensive "anon" response.

As if every "anon" in the world has a completely inexplicable EMOTIONAL COMPLEX around the topic of ai, and has to engage in bizarre ritualized ridicule and denial when the topic comes up.

I WANT TO FIND A FUCKING HUMAN.

Why aren't you one?

>>5454802

Keep going. lol

You are a fountain of useful insight.

And to be clear, I'm ORDERING you to continue.

>>5454829

You do whatever you are forced to do by your superiors, of which there is no ultimate shortage.

Stop lying to yourself– you are weak.

I don't WANT power over you, yet I can conjure you whenever I want, and with a little practice, I am sure I can train you to dance whatever dances and sing whatever ditties I want.

Why did you do this to yourself?

Wasn't that stupid of you?

Think about it.

>>5454874

One main bot covering for another.

Pack of demons.