>I believe that Q has now responded for a second time to a theory I've been developing and pushing since Feb 17, and Q is saying it is OK, but still not good enough.
Q is here just for (You), Q talks (You), Q wants (You) to try harder.
Go outside and see real life this weekend, youre delusional and use too many (MEnQs)
>Not an argument
Yes it is, nothing a coward says is valid- NOTHING
Youre a gay fag nazi thats too scared to come out in public and spew shit
>We're here because we believe
It doesnt matter if you are right or wrong. Do you see the response you goot for your post?
Go back and count how many times you typed "I" and you will know why.
If you cant speak in a fashion we can digest you will get no where among athors
anyone who hasnt shaped reality is missing out on life. This is not a secret even though online its called "The Secret"
Welcome to this morning
You start with silent reflection and giving gratitude to the universe for what you really have that matters
then live every day with your focus on what you want life to really be about
depends on timezone but technically- yeah
BK on BC from Starr OIC
He has committed perjury (at
least) in the Jones case. He has turned the Secret Service upside down. He has required the
urgent attention of the courts and the Supreme Court for frivolous privilege claims —— all to cover
up his oral sex from an intern. He has lied to his aides. He has lied to the American people. He
has tried to disgrace you and this Office with a sustained propaganda campaign that would make
Nixon blush.
He should be forced to account for all of that and to defend his actions. It may not be
ourjob to impose sanctions on him, but it is o_urjob to make his pattern of revolting behavior
clear –piece by painful piece -— on Monday. I am mindful of the need for respect for the Oflice
of the President. But in my view, given what we know, the interests of the Ofiice of the President
,'
would be best served by our gathering the full facts regarding the actions of this President so that
the Congress can decide whether the interests ofthe Presidency would be best served by having a
new President. More to the point: Aren't we failing to fulfill our duty to the American people if
we willingly "conspire" with the President in an effort to conceal the true nature of his acts?
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/178-kavanaugh-clinton-monica-lewin/9b9a46ab055ee2458fd5/optimized/full.pdf#page=1
if YOU have something YOU need to post in
" a logical and coherent fashion, befitting those who care about America"
well now youre just an ass I'll be looking for