Anonymous ID: 385c7c March 1, 2019, 11:27 p.m. No.5460624   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0627 >>0795 >>1129

>>5460510 pb (continuing account re previous notable)

 

highlights, emergency debate, Canada's Justice scandal, continued …

 

There is a very complicated reference made in the debate. It is to the issue of child abuse in residential schools. I do not have the time to go into the detail here and now. But the key is that the former AG is an established aboriginal (i.e. Indian) leader who entered Parliament with a mission on that portfolio but was stymied by the Liberal government. That is an important context in which to consider her stand on this other scandal. The PM had pushed her too far and, frankly, as a bumbling politico he made a mess of something he supposedly – at least in election campaign rhetoric – had made a yuge part of his appeal to the Indian vote. In many ridings around the country, it was the Indian vote that won Trudeau's Liberals the majority they needed to become the Government in the last election.

 

The former AG helped with that presentation during the election campaign. She gave it credibility.

 

The former AG was betrayed, to be blunt about it. Now, whether or not one agrees with her stand on what is known as the aboriginal framework, it is readily apparent that Trudeau has been an utter failure as a politician – a corrupt one at that. Most rough hand politicos in Canada would have gotten away with this. But he is so inept he crashed and burned.

 

And the cost will be paid by the rest of the Liberal Party under him.

 

For most Anons the name of the former AG is Jody Wilson-Raybould. I'll just call her JWR in future posts. Her father was the previous generations aboriginal voice during the constitutional crisis that occurred during the government of Justin Trudeau's father, Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Her father stood up against Trudeau then, just as his daughter is standing up against Trudeau's son today.

 

As others have said, I disagree with both JWR and her father's group identity politics and leftish leanings. They are prolly moar left than PM Trudeau on just about everything. But I am astonished by her guts in defending the rule of law. I think it will come out that she had been less gutsy on other cases but the case of SNC-Lavalin was the last straw. She had been humiliated both politically and professional – behind closed doors.

 

moar highlights in a bit…

Anonymous ID: 385c7c March 1, 2019, 11:31 p.m. No.5460646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0658

>>5460627

 

Fren, one can live in hope of that, yes.

 

She also is a politician. And her stand will prolly bring a good deal moar sympathy and support to her mission on the "aboriginal framework". The rule of law is at issue but it is not really the central issue for JWR. This will play out as both a linchpin in the slow boil that caused her to make this stand.

Anonymous ID: 385c7c March 1, 2019, 11:50 p.m. No.5460795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0807 >>1006 >>1025 >>1133

>>5460624

 

… highlights of emergency debate, Justice scandal, Canadian parliament.

 

Re-reviewing now but only 1/4th the way through. Taking a break and will resume shortly.

 

Three points raised in the debate: SNC-Lavalin paid about $50 million in bribes to the Qadafi regime in Lybia. This connection should be lost on Anons who are aware of the Hussein Admin's record on Lybia under Sec State Hilary.

 

Also, there is the matter of trafficking in sex workers – in Canada.

 

And there's the global reach of SNC-Lavalin and its many connections between corrupt governments (fragile democracies some but most not even close) and western democratic governments (see deep state).

 

Third, what is unfolding is the tearing apart of the Liberal Party's patchwork of identity groups – starting with the Indians. The power to corrupt reaches into each and every such group. So these will splinter. Will they splinter on the basis of rule of law?

 

And side note that may become moar prominent in these highlights is that PM Trudeau actually proposed to JWR (former AG) that he appoint what in Canada is known as an eminent individual (someone with supposed high credibility and neutrality) to advise her on the SNC-Lavalin plea deal case. In other words, he would appoint someone who'd be answerable to him but whose public profile would outrank the sitting AG. Astonishing, really. But moar crazy than that? He would appoint a former Justice of the Supreme Court to play that role.

 

Think about that. PM Trudeau would reach into the judiciary (yes a former Justice is still considered a representative of the judicial role, hence the reason he would be handpicked to do the political deed Trudeau demanded) for a friend of the Liberal Party. That is a backhanded admission that the Liberal Party had judges – even Supreme Court Justices – covering their partisan backsides.

 

There is some fog around that last point because it is a very deep point of leverage within the deep state in Canada.

 

Anons in the US might understand this in terms of liberal v conservative judges but I think we also see it in terms of the anti-Trump judges who have made stuff up to thwart POTUS Trump on matters such as the travel bans.

 

Godspeed Anons

Anonymous ID: 385c7c March 2, 2019, 1:06 a.m. No.5461133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1195

>>5460795

 

>>5461006

>every theatre in the capitol city of Edmonton states at the beginning of every performance that the theatre sits on native land. WTF?

 

Happens throughout Canada. Was done by JWR at the hearing when she testified.

 

>>5461025

You are more than welcome, fren. The Deep State seems to know no boundaries.

 

The debate ran 5 hours or so. Just 1/4th the way through in re-reviewing it with highlight notes.

 

The MSM in Canada is such that the PM's Office promised JWR (former AG) that if she changed her mind and took a plea deal instead of prosecuting SNC-Lavalin, they'd line-up op-eds saying she was doing the right (and legal) thing. Was it an empty promise?

 

I think that it was said in earnest. But that they would not tolerate a loose cannon in the Cabinet. They thought they could just move her out of the AG role and later force her out of the alternate cabinet role. But they rushed and bumbled. Now they have an enemy rather than a compliant, if reluctant, underling. So this shows political corruption combined with ineptitude. Stoooopid.

 

That the MSM could be counted on to backup stoooopid is unsurprising given the MSM's record on Justin Trudeau both before and after he became PM.