Anonymous ID: 996841 March 1, 2019, 11:34 p.m. No.5460667   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0695 >>0700 >>1115

My thoughts on drops has changed, think that is why Q always says to go reread crumbs.. it is that as we learn more, we evolve and the picture becomes more focused.

 

This drop 10. Talks about comey letting folks know there were 2 investigations into HRC.. I remember Gowdy saying history is going to paint a different picture for comey..

 

So he DID poach Hillaryโ€™s chance, I mean those last few people on the fence definately did Vote President Trump after hearing that.. it was a straw that broke the camels back. It really was.

 

We have to look at that and ask why did he did that if he was not apart of the plan, like meuller. Q goes on to say some went along cause they had to. I do believe that is him.. something recently that came out was McCabe in his book slamming comey. That to me shows a divide between the 2. Now going back to when comey leaked the story on RR wearing a wire, or offering toโ€ฆ we this to get him in line? RR was a bit of a loose character i believe, Q saying he was doing things and saying things.. meeting w people, calls between him and LL..

 

Mother fuck could comey be on Q team!? Was the gnomb he was pointing at and laughing him trolling!? Like something to look back on โ€œhistoryโ€ and as gowdy said.. history will be kinder to comey?

 

Was comey a cattle dog corraling the loose ends for Q team? Someone steps out of line he was there to leak or in a backwards way set them straight? A handler almost?

 

Something to think about.

Anonymous ID: 996841 March 1, 2019, 11:44 p.m. No.5460744   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0754

>>5460700

>>5460708

I think anon is righ, hes free.

 

Like kim jung un. Here we were told family was bad, if so evil, so bad why Y kkm jung il have full nation crying for him when he died? The say Americans are most lied to people on earth.. it sure as fuck seems that way.

 

Damn.

Anonymous ID: 996841 March 2, 2019, 12:15 a.m. No.5460950   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5460920

Shuutle could mean definition shuttle, not craft called shuttle. As in take people to space from our tech, gov spends money then asks for more, only gets said amount if it can spend it. Now think of parellel tech to moon landing ( ben rich we can take et home) and massive expensive budgets and secret black projects and you have nasa. Unless a diff branch broke off a piece of their cqndybar to fund it