kek
>Mother fuck could comey be on Q team!?
Comey is playing a role.
If he does not play that role, there are negative consequences for him.
And
Is Comey Military? No?
;)
PFFFFFFfffff…. . . .
Some people forget the golden fucking rule it seems.
'Future proves past
Everything must be assembled in retrospect.
ZERO fortune telling can be done.
I'm not talking about just the clockfags.
Anyway. Think about this:
do you know what it's like to live in a Republic, restored to your personal ideal is like?
Do you really know what it's like?
The answer should be' "yes". Because we're learning to do it here on the daily by paying attention to current events and holding feet to the fire to win… Reality… back. Looks wierd to see in text, but it's true.
We're a microcosm here; The next phase will be mainstreaming the awareness of the need to ''PARTICIPATE''' in one's own governance, in a true Republic, and not rely on hearsay to decide whether a person is a traitor and a liar, or not.
That is all.
>C_A does not hide stuff from POTUS?
The CIA's hiding stuff days are done. The head is a Trump gal now and you won't see anything in the news about internal doings.
>fuck off with that shit famefag
That's not famefagging.
saying what they said, and then claiming they are an identifiable person is famefagging.
oh God If (you) counts are famefagging I was famfagging like a motherfucking asshole and giving zero fucks about it last night kek..
This is actually valuable information… in a way.
How many and what demographic of people will blindly follow the trend of throwing cheese on their kids?
Can this demographic data be linked to other data points?
ie- the intel agencies all collected the data on who followed this trend, because some, if not all of those know ''why'' this happened because they can read all of the internet traffic.
I've suspected something similar to that over the years actually: I think the "challenges" have been (unknown entity's) way of gauging public pliability.
Baker asked for pasta. I give re-pasta. enjoy.
>Why isnt filter > ID+ working?
Here, have a cup of clue.
It comes in two parts; first part is the set up:
1) the shills know anons that use the filter will filter UIDs they don't like early in the bread.
2) they spam the egregious shit that makes anons know its [them] early in the bread, knowing it will trigger some anons to UID filter.
3) the UIDs respond to themselves with helper UIDs. This is important for the second prong, below.
3) the filter-using anons oblige, and filter the UIDs.
Now's where the 2nd part of this vector comes in:
4) The shills will hard sell Filter UID+. This filters UIDs AND responses.
5) Some of the filtered UIDs start attempting to "blend into the crowd" by posting less egregious shit as the bread gets consumed, in the hopes that enough of the user population has filtered them that they can start building a false consensus.
6) the helper UIDs, also having been filtered, start responding to the blending shills, to start manufacturing consensus.
''This happens every bread, and will not be noticed by individuals using the software filters.''
How far away is the closest star?
what do you think?
>gold star researchers
>What do you think?
Nah, I think Q was being sarcastic and asking that anon if they were an autist or not ;p