>>5460535

If 2/3rds of the states (34 states) get together they can change a fed law. Hannity talks about it.

I forget what it's called.

>>5460636

No, no, it's something else.

Something like federation of states or something

>>5460666

Yes, that's it!

>>5460636

Another anon nailed it

Constitutional convention is what I was trying to think of

>>5460690

Probably

>>5460690

>>5460666

Convention of States aka an Article V Convention

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendments_to_the_United_States

Praeger and Hannity talk about it on their radio shows

>>5460581

Sandwich or the eL?

>>5460915

And a bayonet!

>>5460863

I don't actually remember

I'm just mixing apples and oranges

Your post re sanctuary cities and states rights to nullify a federal law reminded me of the 34 states necessary to change a law in the convention of states but IDK if that has any impact or if it matters re sanctuary cities. Probably not

>>5461098

Yea, I certainly hope so!

I'm not a lawyer, but something has to give.

Corruption everywhere.

Courts//judges making their own laws and congress enriching themselves, etc.

Thank God for the white hats!

>>5461182

So what was that 1888 thing about in the SOTU?

And why do people keep talking about gold fringe on the flag vs no gold fringe?

>>5461220

What the heck is a non-bar lawyer?

Don't all lawyers have to pass the bar to practice?