An anon posted a couple of breads ago about the deliberate mis-spelling in Q's posts and Trump's tweets. He speculated that perhaps Q was demonstrating a way to get around social media's programmed censorship. Does this seem like a reasonable premise, or should we be looking for some kind of coding in the mis-spelled and/or omitted words?
I'd have to think on it. I know there have been many who have had their livelihoods removed because of being shut down or demonetized.
Instagram just shut down Pamela Geller's 2 daughters when they were outed by Daily Beast as being her daughters.
Disagree. They are human and not immune to error. But they have done a huge job for many years trying to put truth out there facing immense opposition. One of the main reasons Alex has been pushing the products is because of the demonetization issue. They work hard and I don't begrudge them making a living at what they do.
The Khazar story has been around for a while and has become part of the Anglo-Israel theory of the 10 lost tribes. There is no serious linguistic, historical, or DNA evidence for it, nor is there any serious biblical evidence for it. To the contrary, there is much serious evidence against it. But that doesn't stop people from promoting it heavily on this and other boards. Many people are heavily invested in it emotionally because of the people in the cabal who are Jewish.
You are full of pride because you think this board is the end all and be all of what is happening in the world and no one else has or deserves a part in it. You should pay respect to people who have also been laboring at this, many years longer than you.
I know lots of people who have been red-pilled specifically thanks to Alex Jones. At least give credit where credit is due.
Didn't Q say more than once that the cabal wants us divided? Why are we turning on people who are on the same side as us? Maybe we don't have 100% in common with them, but they should not be treated as our enemies.
I can try but the subject is not simplistic.
Where to start? Let's look at the 10 lost tribe theory. If you carefully read the pertinent biblical accounts as well as history you will find that the 10 Israelite tribes who were taken into captivity by the Assyrians were only partially removed. Many were left behind and joined in with the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and part of Simeon. These are alluded to in the Old Testament.
Also, the Bible specifically states that the Assyrians had a method of preventing uprisings by resettling the conquered peoples in different areas. Many assimilated there or later joined up with the Jews from Jerusalem who were taken captive to Babylon.
A remnant of the inter-married Jews who retained a vestige of their Jewish identity were the Samaritans who remain in the region of Samaria until this day and were referred to in the New Testament, notably in the story of the Good Samaritan.
So there are undoubtedly some descendants of the 10 tribes who are part of the Jewish people but no longer know which tribe they are descended from. However, most assimilated.
There are lots of linguistic things I could go into but people are very misled by linguistic errors such as trying to build connections out of English sounds.
For example: Dan in Hebrew (one of the 12 tribes) has no linguistic connection with the Danish language. Danish is a northern Germanic language while Hebrew is a semitic language. But people will say that the tribe of Dan migrated to Denmark because Dan sounds like Danish.
Or take for example the word Israel. Israel is an English translation/pronunciation of the Hebrew word Yishrael. This name was given by God to Jacob after the night he spent wrestling with the angel.
Yish means man in the Hebrew language. Ra in Hebrew means bad or against. El means God. So it is a construct word meaning Man who wrestles with God. A name that was given to Jacob as a name of honor.
However, people will take the English spelling and try to equate it with the Egyptian deities Isis and Ra and use that fallacious argument to make a pejorative slur upon the Jewish people.
Shall I go on? :)
And no, I am not Jewish.
I don't know the Q decode yet, but it seems like the thunder (that we make) could help to take the amendments out of the kill box?
So if I figure it correctly, we have an extra a, y, r, h, and a. We are missing an i and a d.
I say = is with extra ay
Why has NK should be why is NK so drop ha and add i.
first change should be changed=add d.
second change is fine
your is extra r.
Well I'd have to disagree with you on some points. I don't think I'd lump AJ in with Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Brennan, etc. and I'm smart enough to realize that Q doesn't want us to unite with them and that they're not on the same side as we are.
I don't know how you could possibly think that I believe otherwise.
I do know that AJ has been at this for over 20 years, so to say that he shows things that have been out a long time I believe is a stretch. Sure the cabal has been at work for many more years than that, but really. Hundreds of videos on the internet that he has put out and that many people have watched and gotten their eyes opened, even if just a little bit.
He may have done a lot of things on a personal level that shouldn't have been done. You could say the same for everyone. It's not my place to go to war against him. I don't have enough personal knowledge to speak against him with a high degree of authority and so in the meantime, I will acknowledge the good I believe he has done and carry on with minding my own business.
Oh, is it you, Grumpy?
Recent studies have been conducted on a large number of genes homologous chromosomes or autosomes (all chromosomes except chromosomes X and Y). A 2009 study was able to genetically identify individuals with full or partial Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.[8] In August 2012, Dr. Harry Ostrer in his book Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People, summarized his and other work in genetics of the last 20 years, and concluded that all major Jewish groups share a common Middle Eastern origin.[9] Ostrer also refuted the Khazar theory of Ashkenazi ancestry.[10] Citing autosomal DNA studies, Nicholas Wade estimates that "Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly 30 percent European ancestry, with most of the rest from the Middle East." He further noticed that "The two communities seem very similar to each other genetically, which is unexpected because they have been separated for so long." Concerning this relationship he points to Atzmon's conclusions that "the shared genetic elements suggest that members of any Jewish community are related to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth cousins in a large population, which is about 10 times higher than the relationship between two people chosen at random off the streets of New York City"[11] Concerning North African Jews, autosomal genetic analysis in 2012 revealed that North African Jews are genetically close to European Jews. This finding "shows that North African Jews date to biblical-era Israel, and are not largely the descendants of natives who converted to Judaism,"[12] Y DNA studies examine various paternal lineages of modern Jewish populations. Such studies tend to imply a small number of founders in an old population whose members parted and followed different migration paths.[13] In most Jewish populations, these male line ancestors appear to have been mainly Middle Eastern. For example, Ashkenazi Jews share more common paternal lineages with other Jewish and Middle Eastern groups than with non-Jewish populations in areas where Jews lived in Eastern Europe, Germany and the French Rhine Valley. This is consistent with Jewish traditions in placing most Jewish paternal origins in the region of the Middle East.[14][3]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Jews
Genetic studies on Jews have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among Ashkenazi Jews, as opposed to evidence they have mixed Near Eastern/Mediterranean and Southern European origins.[10]
Before modern DNA population genetics entered the field, Raphael Patai described the Khazars in racial terms as being a Turkic people with some Mongoloid admixture.[102] After major advances in DNA sequence analysis and computing technology in the late 20th and early 21st century, a plethora of genetic research on Jewish and other human populations has been conducted worldwide. The Yiddish scholar Alexander Beider regards genetic studies as often offering contradictory information, further complicated by the fact that some researchers' work is influenced by personal views.[103]
According to Martin B. Richards, presently available genetic studies, including his own study on Ashkenazi maternal lineages, all refute the Khazar theory.[104] The claim that Ashkenazis as a whole take their origin from Khazars has been widely criticized as there is no direct evidence to support it.[105][106] Using four Jewish groups, one being Ashkenazi, Kopelman et al found no evidence to the Khazar theory.[107]
While the consensus in genetic research is that the world's Jewish populations (including the Ashkenazim) share substantial genetic ancestry derived from a common Ancient Middle Eastern founder population, and that Ashkenazi Jews have no genetic ancestry attributable to Khazars,[6]at least one study authored in this period diverge from the majority view in favor of the Khazar theory.
Counter-evidence exists to the Khazar hypothesis claiming that the male lineage of Ashkenazi Jews originates from an ancient (2000 BCE - 700 BCE) population of the Middle East who spread to Europe. -DNA studies of Ashkenazi Jews conclude that their male lineage was founded by ancestors from the Middle East.[108][109] and that they share this paternal ancestry with Sephardic Jewish populations.[110] Genetic studies show that the male lineage of Ashkenazi Jews bear a common genetic heritage which originates in the Near East, and that they bear their strongest resemblance to the peoples of the Fertile Crescent. A study of Ashkenazi mitochondrial DNA by a team led by Martin B. Richards of the University of Huddersfield found no maternal lineages attributable to the Caucasus. Richards summarized the findings on the female line as such:
"[N]one [of the mtDNA] came from the North Caucasus, located along the border between Europe and Asia between the Black and Caspian seas. All of our presently available studies including my own, should thoroughly debunk one of the most questionable, but still tenacious, hypotheses: that most Ashkenazi Jews can trace their roots to the mysterious Khazar Kingdom that flourished during the ninth century in the region between the Byzantine Empire and the Persian Empire."[104]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry
Tribal origins and early history[edit]
The tribes[41] that were to comprise the Khazar empire were not an ethnic union, but a congeries of steppe nomads and peoples who came to be subordinated, and subscribed to a core Türkic leadership.[42] Many Turkic groups, such as the Oğuric peoples, including Šarağurs, Oğurs, Onoğurs, and Bulğars who earlier formed part of the Tiĕlè (鐵勒) confederation, are attested quite early, having been driven West by the Sabirs, who in turn fled the Asian Avars, and began to flow into the Volga-Caspian-Pontic zone from as early as the 4th century CE and are recorded by Priscus to reside in the Western Eurasian steppelands as early as 463.[43][44] They appear to stem from Mongolia and South Siberia in the aftermath of the fall of the Hunnic/Xiōngnú nomadic polities. A variegated tribal federation led by these Turks, probably comprising a complex assortment of Iranian,[45] proto-Mongolic, Uralic, and Palaeo-Siberian clans, vanquished the Rouran Khaganate of the hegemonic central Asian Avars in 552 and swept westwards, taking in their train other steppe nomads and peoples from Sogdiana.[46]
The ruling family of this confederation may have hailed from the Āshǐnà (阿史那) clan of the West Türkic tribes,[47] though Constantine Zuckerman regards Āshǐnà and their pivotal role in the formation of the Khazars with scepticism.[48] Golden notes that Chinese and Arabic reports are almost identical, making the connection a strong one, and conjectures that their leader may have been Yǐpíshèkuì (Chinese:乙毗射匱), who lost power or was killed around 651.[49] Moving west, the confederation reached the land of the Akatziroi,[50] who had been important allies of Byzantium in fighting off Attila's army.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars#Genetic_studies
If the Jewish people did not intermarry with the Khazars to the extent that it would show up in DNA testing, who knows? One could just as easily say they took their play book from the peoples of any other country to which they were dispersed.
Ha! You know nothing about me. Your first accusation is accurate but not the way you intend. The second is ridiculous and an ad hominem.
You are completely off base. I certainly do want to throw off all deception and lies no matter who it's from including Jews. But I think critically enough to throw off slovenly scholarship and non-substantiated legends.
This hypothesis has had a complex history within academia. While most contemporary scholars dismiss it, the hypothesis has often been argued in the past, and still finds
occasional defenders of its plausibility. In the late 19th century, Ernest Renan and other scholars speculated that the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe originated among Turkic refugees who had migrated from the collapsed Khazarian Khanate westward into Europe, and exchanged their native Khazar language for Yiddish while continuing to practice Judaism. Though intermittently evoked by several scholars since that time, the Khazar-Ashkenazi hypothesis came to the attention of a much wider public with the publication of Arthur Koestler's The Thirteenth Tribe in 1976.[7] It has been revived recently by Eran Elhaik, who in 2012 conducted a study aiming to vindicate it.[8] Despite skepticism, he reformulated the concept in 2016 by developing a novel method of genetic analysis that uses the fringe linguistic theories of the Yiddish expert Paul Wexler.[9]
part 1
part 2
Elhaik's 2012 study proved highly controversial. Several noted geneticists, among them Marcus Feldman, Harry Ostrer and Michael Hammer have maintained - and the view has gained widespread support among scientists - that the world-wide Jewish population is homogeneous and shares common roots in the Middle East, Feldman stated Elhaik's statistical analysis would not pass muster with most scientists; Hammer affirmed it was an outlier minority view without scientific support. Elhaik in reply described the group as ‘liars’ and ‘frauds’, noting Ostrer would not share genetic data that might be used ‘to defame the Jewish people’. Elhaik’s PhD supervisor Dan Graur, likewise dismissed them as a ‘clique’, and said Elhaik is ‘combative’ which is what science itself is.[121]
Elhaik's 2012 study was specifically criticized for its use of Armenians and Azerbaijani Jews as proxies for Khazars and for using Bedouin and Jordanian Hashemites as a proxy for the Ancient Israelites. The former decision was criticized because Armenians were assumed to have a monolithic Caucasian ancestry, when as an Anatolian people (rather than Turkic) they contain many genetically Middle Eastern elements. Azerbaijani Jews are also assumed for the purposes of the study to have Khazarian ancestry, when Mountain Jews are actually descended from Persian Jews. The decision to cast Bedouin/Hashemites as "proto-Jews" was especially seen as political in nature, considering that both have origins in Arab tribes from the Arabian Peninsula rather than from the Ancient Israelites, while the descent of the Jews from the Israelites is largely accepted.[122][123] The study was also criticized as interpreting information selectively—The study found far more genetic similarity between the Druze and Ashkenazim than the Ashkenazim and Armenians, but Elhaik rejected this as indicating a common Semitic origin, instead interpreting it as evidence of Druze having Turkic origins when they are known to come from Syria.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry
Geneticists conducting studies in Jewish genetics have challenged Elhaik's methods in his first paper. Michael Hammer called Elhaik's premise "unrealistic," calling Elhaik and other Khazarian hypothesis proponents "outlier folks… who have a minority view that’s not supported scientifically. I think the arguments they make are pretty weak and stretching what we know." Marcus Feldman, director of Stanford University's Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, echoes Hammer. "If you take all of the careful genetic population analysis that has been done over the last 15 years… there’s no doubt about the common Middle Eastern origin," he said. He added that Elhaik’s first paper "is sort of a one-off." Elhaik’s statistical analysis would not pass muster with most contemporary scholars, Feldman said: "He appears to be applying the statistics in a way that gives him different results from what everybody else has obtained from essentially similar data." [8]
Elhaik and Wexler's 2016 study was challenged by two prominent scholars of Jewish demography from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Shaul Stampfer, a professor of Soviet and East European Jewry, deemed it “basically nonsense.” Sergio DellaPergola, the primary demographer of the Jewish people at the university, called it a "falsification", criticizing its methodology, using a small population size and selectively removing population groups that refuted the findings they wanted, namely other Jewish groups such as the Italkim and Sephardic Jews, to whom Ashkenazi Jews are closely related genetically. “Serious research would have factored in the glaring genetic similarity between Sephardim and Ashkenazim, which mean Polish Jews are more genetically similar to Iraqi Jews than to a non-Jewish Pole.”[124] Elhaik replied that “studying the DNA of non-Ashkenazic Jews would not change the DNA of Ashkenazic Jews nor the predicted origin of their DNA.'.[124]
part 4
Recently, a study by a team of biologists and linguists, led by Pavel Flegontov, a specialist in genomics, published a response to Das, Elhaik and Wexler's 2016 study, criticizing their methodology and conclusions. They argue that GPS allows inferences works for the origins of modern populations with an unadmixed genome, but not for tracing ancestries back 1,000 years ago. In their view, the paper tried to fit Wexler's 'marginal and unsupported interpretation' of Yiddish into a model that only permits valid deductions for recent unadmixed populations. [125]
Stampfer study[edit]
In June 2014, Shaul Stampfer published a paper challenging the Khazar hypothesis as ungrounded in sources contemporary with the Khazar period, stating: "Such a conversion, even though it’s a wonderful story, never happened".[5][126]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry
There is no evidence that the Judeans were black. In fact, Moses was criticized by his brother and sister for marrying an Ethiopian woman.
King David was described as ruddy in appearance.
They were most likely darkly colored similarly to other peoples of the Middle East.
What claims do you believe Zionists make that are not supported by the Bible? Many, many Christians make contradictory claims that can't all be supported by the Bible.
Actually, it's not a bad idea. I have read recently about the ACLU defending some conservative causes on the basis of civil liberties, surprising yes but certainly wouldn't hurt to explore the possibility.
Let's see. Freemasons swear an oath to defend their brothers even in the commission of a crime. Transcendental meditation will say that they are a science and not a religion. Mormons were taught by Joseph Smith that it was okay to lie to and steal from non-Mormons. That is why they were driven by mobs out of Missouri. Come on. Really.