Anons,

Working on an anti-division redpilling tool. Setting up a divisive generalization to attack and destroy, but does the generalization hold true? Wondering if anyone else sees the exceptions this anon is missing…

Ordinary politics, by whatever name, devolves to just two binary choices:

Us/them, with one set of rules for “us” and another for “them”; and

Live/let live, so long as “they” aren’t currently causing too many problems for “us.”

WWG1WGA.

>>5467792

Thanks anon, will peruse.

>>5467884

Agreed anon, but if the us/them dichotomy can be elided by expanding "us" until it includes all possible values of "them" (unity, not division), then perhaps "they" can be more easily co-opted, and the cycle of ordinary politics disrupted. That is this anon's philosophical angle of attack.

It's an interesting problem.