Anonymous ID: 16bad3 March 2, 2019, 1 p.m. No.5468154   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8163

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Anonymous ID: 16bad3 March 2, 2019, 1 p.m. No.5468163   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8169

>>5468154

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

"Chan culture" has been co-opted by fakeness and is now being FORCED.

Will patriots ever wake up and demand a space free from FAKENESS?

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

Anonymous ID: 16bad3 March 2, 2019, 1:01 p.m. No.5468169   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5468163

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Where do they come from?

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

Where do they come from?

Do patriots question this?

Do patriots think for themselves, especially when it is obvious something is amiss?

Or not?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

WAKE UP PEOPLE

FIGHT

Anonymous ID: 16bad3 March 2, 2019, 1:02 p.m. No.5468195   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8211

Q: The Basics - An Introduction to Q and the Great Awakening

PDF: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082809

 

^Is this a good introduction to Q?

Is it "the basics"?

Will it help the public to understand what is going on, or make it more confusing, more intimidating, and less appealing?

What qualities would a good introduction have?

How do we know?

Did this get discussed?

Did the COMMUNITY make this?

Or did some "anon" just put it up and say "here it is".

And then there it was at the top of the board, claming to be "the basics"– when in fact it is very CONVOLUTED.

And it our "the basics" docs are CONVOLUTED, does THAT fact play into any MSM narratives about "Qanon"?

About "the chans"?

About weird, confusing, obscure things that normies flee from?

How do you control this movement?

CO-OPT everything, and SUBTLY undermine every place you can?

While maintaining a degree of plausibility?

WHO made "the basics" of Q?

How do we know?

It was NOT made by the community.

The videos the board pushes were NOT made by the community.

The images that appear as banners were NOT made by the community.

The community had no input in the creative process.

And we have no idea who or what the "anons" that produce content and push it out to us are.

We just passively accept that "anons" do all this stuff here.

But is organic?

It is ALL subtly undermining.

And not-so-subtly controlling narrative…