>>547414

nice rebound baker

>>547463

>>547580

yeah, FFL's are publicly listed… that could be troublesome.

t - 22min?

>>547639

It's like the blitz over there, which is strange

because they always said the blitz was ineffective

and ended up giving tommy that stiff upper lip,

emboldening them with near misses.

>>547646

Yeah, the only argument I could see is antitrust

and claiming they're a public utility by accepting

gov't funding and contracts.

No one reads user agreements.

>>547666

where did you get your law degree anon?

>>547682

>would seem

>perhaps

>may

>to decide

>interpreted

that's A LOT of hypothetical qualifiers.

>>547709

Well it seem's you have it all figured out, so wtf are you doing here?

>>547749

here we go

Full list of entities and individuals whose assets were frozen by Trumps EO!

https:// www.treasury.gov/ofac/downloads/sdnlist.pdf

>>548048

First thing I checked too, no Schmidt either…

i've been seeing:

#freetheinternet

#internetbillofrights

seem good to me

anyone from war room here with time charts for maximized reach?

>>548157

I vaguely remember at&t being alluded to if not specifically mentioned

BAKER!

Bread is going to fill quick!

Q is live.

>>548157

BTFO by Q, lol