>>5476830

If the cabal knew or suspected that POTUS would take them down if he won the election (and that was surely apparent from the speeches), even assuming the cabal believed they would win the election (by fraud or blackmail or other "insurance") – why would the cabal take even the most miniscule of risks and steer POTUS towards the nomination when there were many R potential or acutal presidential candidates who were on board with the cabal? It would be playing with fire. I know they're stupid, but seriously, why would the cabal effectively invite their arch-nemesis to the finals of the presidential competition?

>>5477205

Good question. I believe POTUS was maintaining appearances for a long time to get close to them.

Looking back there are clear signatures of being against the cabal; and at the time, not self-censoring to the chains of political correctness was a signal to voters. But from the cabal's perspective - I wonder when they figured it out.