>>5481287

I can bake for a while when you want a break.

o7 baker.

>>5481492

Sounds good I should be here most of the day but will need to take care IRL this evening.

>>5481737

Is he saying they worked in reverse to construct their "evidence?"

They started with the surveillance and then constructed their web of lies in reverse to justify everything.

>>5481737

>>5481757

Also, depending on latency there could be a 17 minute delta between tweets if these were posted within ~10-15 seconds of the minute.

It would erroneously be counted as 18 minutes.

>>5481795

It's true they would have a large window to hit 17 but they only need to screw up one of the tweet windows.