>>548166

>>548157

Re read drops.

http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html

Q

Q, confusion around this…from your original post on this some time ago, lot's of ambiguity and not much more clarity in recent posts. it would seem ATT is pushing this and not you, but we have seen lots of other Anons push this as well and I am not sure if we should be. Can you tell us once and for all whether the Internet Bill of Rights is something we should be pushing or is it an attempt to take more of our freedoms like NN?

>>548506

Tend to agree with that notion anon. MAGA

>>548476

Interestingly, i may have answered my own question using google…look what comes up as the first article returned, an EFF article, so immediately there is a barlow/clown connection it would appear….

search term google:

'who is for and against internet bill of rights'

first URL returned:

The Hypocrisy of AT&T’s “Internet Bill of Rights”

https:// www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/01/hypocrisy-atts-internet-bill-rights

so, I guess other Anons assertions that ATT might be playing for the good guys might be in point…. Q, confirmation?

Well yeah,I know that, but in order to see who the cabal wanted me to think is the good guy, I had to use their tools against them…