dChan
Anonymous ID: 087c61 March 4, 2018, 9:07 a.m. No.548654   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8664 >>8671 >>8722

>>548355

 

I think you are potentially misinterpreting Q's post.

 

My rationale:

 

  • Q called them 'so-called Patriots'. From this I would suggest that Q is saying that if someone who on the surface looks to be a patriot but they are AGAINST the Internet Bill of Rights, they are not a Patriot.

 

  • Q then warns us, 'Careful who you follow'. Based on this, are there some well know 'Patriots' on Twitter who are against the IBR. If they are Q is telling us that they ARE NOT PATRIOTS.

 

Now onto AT&T.

 

  • The CEO of AT&T was one of the first bad actor CEOs to go. He resigned mid-December 2017. AT&T were also one of the first companies to announce a really positive response to the Trump Tax cuts. I saw this as the AT&T penance for all the Clown activity they'd been supporting.

 

Based on this, I view AT&T neutralised and they are now helping POTUS.

 

The AT&T IBR announcement took place in January ie after their swamp was cleared.

 

AT&T are working for the White Hats now

Anonymous ID: 087c61 March 4, 2018, 9:26 a.m. No.548813   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8826 >>8870

>>548664

One who has already been identified is Tracy Beanz.

 

Q is pretty clear with their post. If someone is coming out against the IBR then they are a 'so-called patriot' ie THEY ARE NOT A PATRIOT

 

Why not do a Twitter search and try to find out yourself. The digging might clear your head as you seem to have a dose of the shills.

Anonymous ID: 087c61 March 4, 2018, 9:40 a.m. No.548940   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>548870

I'm not looking to start a witch hunt. I am looking to dig off the back of Q's drops.

 

There is a reason Q made that drop. There will be good patriots on Twitter who may have came out against IBOR. However, I'd suggest that Q is flagging up well known 'so-called patriots'. This then leads to a dig and as part of a dig potential candidates come up.

 

On this occasion Tracy Beanz comes up. She might be cool. Who knows. I do know she was massively involved in all the shit associated with the first 8chan board being comped and encouraging the BO et al to become famefags. That might just be a , just like James Corsi advising that BO that real Q posts were fake, leading to them being deleted. That was a coincidence too.

 

What did Q tell us about coincidences?