I don’t get on here as much as I’d like so my apologies if we knew this already.

February of 2019 was the only month that the dates of the month & the clock seconds (markers, for you newfag) were synchronized.

02/01 marker was [:01], 02/02 was [:02]…etc.

Dates in related pic highlighted.

>>5482217

And I’d like to follow this up with some more clockfaggotry. Seems like DECLAS is all you faggots care about.

Here’s an update about my clock I posted last night.

Markers [:19] & [:42].

How many seconds from [:19] to [:42]?

23

>>5482403

I’m against date setting. Some Q posts don’t have any meaning for a year or two. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if something happened on 03/14 though. It’s within the [-21] day window of 02/26 - 03/19

>>5482447

03/14 was the time on the other watch photo Q gave us on 01/05

>>5482483

[:19] because that’s the marker being point to by the hour hand.

>>5482483

This is asymmetrical warfare

>>5482491

HOLY SHIT. That actually spooked me anon. Totally unintentional.

>>5482530

You do pose a very logical argument for [:18] though. I’m not versed enough in actual clocks and how they work.

>>5482557

Oh yes also interdasting anon!