Q's frequent use of game theory is interesting, because it's fundamentally about cooperation and competition among coalitions and agents who seek the best outcome for themselves. We don't even know all the details, but just watching this is a clinic on strategic domination.
I think the reasons for disinformation are clear. I was just thinking about this yesterday, recalling how Trump would (rightfully) call Obama nuts for announcing deadlines for troop withdrawal. Q talked about this concept many times, e.g. How do you capture a very dangerous animal? Attack it from the front? Do you walk through the front door? Signal ahead of time you will be attacking? Again, these reasons for disinfo are clear.
But the other reason is, intriguingly, still plausible deniability. By having many people in-the-know (the entire world, because of 8ch Q comms), it removes suspicion about those who do know, i.e. those involved in the house cleaning effort. And if everything occurred precisely on certain dates, or with other high-precision criteria, it would not only let the enemy in the front door, it would create suspicion. These optics are important.
But sometimes optics are not important. I presume Q means those who are set up to publicly take one for the team, i.e. the Scaramucci model.
And what's mind boggling about all this? Q is doing everything above, shaping optics, stirring coalitions and agents against each other, and going public with damning info, all while protecting the integrity of campaign. Bravo.