Screencap of tweet linked by Q
Yes, Q, I read the comments. These people are the 4-6% on parade. Rabid. Unreasoning. Hateful. They can't be reasoned with. They are losing people to our side every day, on the margin. But these people are the center, the hard core loons.
This is talking about the "scope" document that kicked off the Mueller Special Counsel. We have been told (or hinted) by Q that the original scope document was broadened (by RR) and then narrowed (by Whitaker).
This is not about the scope of an interview of POTUS by the SC.
If so, then why do you feel so threatened by it? Why don't you just leave if you consider it garbage? Your being here to say that is a clear indication that your only purpose is shilling.
Do you realize how dumb that looks?
>>5487022 Jones prolly came up with the term "nothing burger" by looking in the mirror.
Tulsi Gabbard is possibly the dem front runner, no matter what polls say. She is the ONLY one among them who EVER speaks sensibly,aimed at centrists. Just a long list of drooling traitors. But she also is damaged goods because she represents a demonic party–no getting around that.
Pacer will only be cases filed under federal statutes. (Not state laws). The plaintiff in a federal criminal case is almost always USA. Maybe in a whistleblower case the plaintiff could be the whistleblower filing who is under federal law. Or maybe the plaintiff could be the US Attorney in one of the federal Districts.