>>5487403

With all love, that is 100% not accurate.

The real majority aren't on Twitter, and only use FB to keep up with classmates and distant relatives, unless they're using it as the basis of their Tinder app.

They don't really watch the news, and only keep up with current events in a general way that's primarily informed by pop culture and the general zeitgeist.

Do you really think any of these people have any idea of what's going on, or even a basis of understanding if you start trying to talk about FVEY and other technical shit?

The end justifies the means, Trump is a bad guy, therefore anything done to get him gone is totally okay.

That's the reality of what we're looking at.

Worse, even if complete disclosure came today, it's a beginning, not an end. People hate change, and fundamentally don't want to the world to change. If we rounded up every cabal dickhead today and set them all on fire, how does that fix the decades of cultural Marxism and mis-education people are laboring under?

There will be millions of people trying to return us to the old system, completely certain that they're the good guys and all the evidence against the cabal weirdos is faked.

>>5487611

I hear you.

My main concern(fag) is that in terms of realistic expectations, I have to conclude that Q's theoretical timeline and talk of [BOOM]s are primarily designed to fuck with DS actors, and in no way reflect the reality of the situation.

Besides this, it seems safe to say that the actual process of untangling the current Gordian-shitshow knot is going to take longer than the time available, even assuming Trump gets a full 2nd term, given the current effort to prevent bloodshed and social upheaval.

How the hell is that supposed to work? The idea that Q+ is going to gently wake up the world using only the existing legal apparatus in the next 6 years frankly doesn't pass the smell test.

And what then? The cabal/banksters goons have been running the show for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Without literal blood in the streets and a clean wipe of the playing board, I'm sadly pretty confident in saying that there's no way to solve this problem the way it currently appears to be being approached.

At that point you have to start agreeing with the people saying the whole thing is misdirection form something else. If the stated goals are, in fact, the actual goals of the movement, it's not going to be possible to achieve them given the current operational constraints.

>>5487829

Probably just falling prey to emotional programming.

In any case, we'll see what we'll see.

>>5487947

I'm starting to think the Q movement is a sort of dead-man's switch in case the legal stuff doesn't work. Get a portion of woke, and as you said, in many cases armed part of the population whipped up enough that if it comes down to it, there's a motivated minority that isn't interested in continuing in the status-quo system.

Lynching as a federal crime or no.