dChan
 2943
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4c2e9e March 3, 2019, 3:17 p.m. No.5488382   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8389 >>8394 >>8395 >>8397 >>8398 >>8401 >>8412 >>8413 >>8414 >>8418 >>8419 >>8422 >>8424 >>8426 >>8429 >>8430 >>8431 >>8433 >>8435 >>8436 >>8437 >>8438 >>8439 >>8440 >>8442 >>8443 >>8444 >>8450 >>8451 >>8453 >>8454 >>8456 >>8457 >>8460 >>8461 >>8462 >>8463 >>8464 >>8465 >>8466 >>8472 >>8475 >>8476 >>8477 >>8479 >>8480 >>8481 >>8482 >>8483 >>8485 >>8488 >>8489 >>8494 >>8496 >>8498 >>8499 >>8502 >>8503 >>8504 >>8505 >>8506 >>8509 >>8512 >>8515 >>8516 >>8518 >>8521 >>8522 >>8524 >>8525 >>8527 >>8532 >>8534 >>8535 >>8536 >>8537 >>8552 >>8554 >>8560 >>8562 >>8564 >>8565 >>8572 >>8573 >>8576 >>8580 >>8584 >>8588 >>8592 >>8594 >>8595 >>8597 >>8604 >>8606 >>8611 >>8612 >>8614 >>8616 >>8617 >>8621 >>8625 >>8627 >>8628 >>8629 >>8634 >>8642 >>8643 >>8647 >>8651 >>8657 >>8660 >>8663 >>8671 >>8680 >>8681 >>8686 >>8687 >>8688 >>8697 >>8700 >>8708 >>8728 >>8729 >>8731 >>8744 >>8750 >>8763 >>8771 >>8779 >>8781 >>8818 >>8841 >>8846 >>8851 >>8852 >>8856 >>8857 >>8878 >>8907 >>8911

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1102265163107971077

More statements made (evidence) without presenting facts.

If 'evidence' exists(ed), under 'broad' scope #1, would Mueller have the auth to pursue?

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and

(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

Because no evidence exists(ed) and/or was found by SC/Mueller, was scope #2 enacted in an attempt to go outside of the 'intended engagement'?

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4429989-Rod-Rosenstein-memo-outlining-scope-of-Mueller.html

Why is scope #2 classified only to AG/DAG and a select few others (read at terminal only)?

If 'evidence' exists(ed), why did R+D members of the Senate conclude NO DIRECT EVIDENCE EXISTS …………..?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536

If 'evidence' exists(ed), as per your statement released today, again, why did the SENATE (R's + D's) JUST CONCLUDE NO EVIDENCE EXISTS?

When will Americans wake up to the [D] party con that is continually pushed without facts, without support, and supported and further pushed by the media arm of the [D] party [FAKE NEWS MEDIA]?

Reading the comments on these Tweets further demonstrates the seriousness of media brainwashing in our Country whereby statements are considered fact w/o the need to provide proof.

Group-Think.

Control of the Narrative.

If enough people state the same thing w/o providing evidence and/or support does it become FACTUAL to those caught in the loop?

NATIONAL CRISIS.

Q