Do not confuse banning from 'social media' as the license of private business owners.

Humans have used shunning and humiliation from the beginning of their history. Shunning and humiliation are tools within a society or culture that wants to curb a certain type of activity BUT the individual who was shunned or humiliated would have an opportunity to rejoin said society or culture.

Adversely, the banning that is occurring on 'social media' is an excommunication, literally.

THINK INQUISITION.

THINK 1984.

To permanently exclude an individual or group from the society or culture is to forever stifle their speech. Granted, our society 'excommunicates' certain criminals. We simply do not want certain genes being allowed to exist in our gene pool. Conversely, the excommunication of individuals and groups on social media is generally a function of collectivists banning individualists.

The collectivists so fear the message of individualists they are willing to openly attempt to stifle their speech.

WHY?

Because the individualists' speech has imbedded within it a thought or philosophy that the collectivists cannot counter.

It is the concept of the FREE MAN that the collectivists cannot counter.

Make no mistake, speech is only a function of thought. BANISHMENT FROM SOCIAL MEDIA IS PROOF THAT THE REAL CHARGE IS THOUGHT CRIME.