Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:19 p.m. No.5495051   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5141

What is the keystone?

In all aspects?

Consider:

 

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

Why is the temple on top of a mountain?

How many levels might exist below?

What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?

Why is this relevant?

Who are the puppet masters?

Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?

When? How often? Why?

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Q

 

In this context, what is the keystone?

Why don't we answer?

 

The answer lies deeper.

Why don't we try to answer?

Some truths are difficult to accept.

Reality is stranger than we commonly think…

 

What keeps us from diving into this question?

Why do “anons” insist on more superficial answer, and get angry if the question is pushed deeper?

Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:22 p.m. No.5495104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5122 >>5290

>>5495076

Why was the gif highlighted?

Was there a meaning?

Use logic?

What was the meaning?

P-A-N-I-C?

How can you tell?

How do you control twiter?

How do you control narrative?

 

Who decides WHICH "ALT RIGHT" MEME is the top comment?

Would THAT be something that got controlled?

Easily, in fact?

 

So what does this tell us?

Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:23 p.m. No.5495132   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5158

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Where do they come from?

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

It doesn't

Where do they come from?

Do patriots question this?

Do patriots think for themselves, especially when it is obvious something is amiss?

Or not?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

We are the news– but we don't have control HERE

Hence, we have not done our job of CHANGING THE PUBLIC NARRATIVE.

FIGHT, PEOPLE

Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:25 p.m. No.5495158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5193

>>5495132

Look closely

What does this convey?

What does it REALLY convey?

What is the body language?

What does IT portray?

Does it sneak in something different from what you THOUGHT the meme meant?

Look at it.

UNDERMINING us?

Who makes these?

Why do they all play these sneaky undermining games?

Do patriots ever wake up here?

Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:27 p.m. No.5495193   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5205

>>5495158

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

"Chan culture" has been co-opted by fakeness and is now being FORCED.

Will patriots ever wake up and demand a space free from FAKENESS?

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

Anonymous ID: 3fa3ed March 3, 2019, 8:27 p.m. No.5495205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5380

>>5495193

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ