>>5489667 (pb)

>At what point is it statistically impossible?

>Q

Am I the only effing mathematician here?!? Is there not one other person who knows that this is a nonsense question, nothing more than a rhetorical trick??

In the first place, nothing becomes statistically (or "Q" sometimes says mathematically) "impossible" – odds can be large or small, but something is either possible or it is not.

But the biggest problem with this is that it is nonsense because the twats and other events are never announced in advance for timing, and with every post that Q makes, the odds INCREASE that some of them will be close in time to some action from POTUS.

If Q announced AHEAD OF TIME "You'll hear from us just after 8pm this evening", and if that happened, THAT would be significant. Nothing else is or can be when it comes to coincidental timing.