>>5492665 (pb)

Earlier tonight, a statistician asked for information regarding how often there were zero-delta events. I obtained a list of the times of all Q posts from qanon.pub, and all Trump's tweets from trumptwitterarchive.com. Then I created a CSV file listing all these events, and posted that file to pastebin so you can work with (or verify) the raw data.

Zero deltas where Q posts first are most interesting, because this sequence eliminates the possibility of zero deltas arising from someone watching for Trump tweets and then posting in response. If there's a spike at zero delta when Q posts first, that's evidence of Trump choosing when to tweet based on the timing of Q's posts. So for each Q post, I measured the number of seconds between the Q post and the next Trump tweet. Then I put these in one-minute bins (zero delta = Trump tweeted within 60 seconds) and graphed the results.

The number of "zero delta" events (36) is higher than for any other delta on the graph. This is statistical evidence that Q is not a LARP. (If Q were a LARP, you would expect to see random noise in this graph.)

https://pastebin.com/5wrTxrR7

>>5496672

>>5496739

>>5496794

After posting, I noticed an error in my raw data. When scraping from qanon.pub I hadn't distinguished between Q's posts and embedded copies of anon's posts that Q responded to … so the data set was too large.

I've fixed that, and am about to re-post the information (doing separately so that's a cleaner post.)

Baker, please update the notables link when I have that up …

>>5492665 (pb)

Earlier tonight, a statistician asked for information regarding how often there were zero-delta events. I obtained a list of the times of all Q posts from qanon.pub, and all Trump's tweets from trumptwitterarchive.com. Then I created a CSV file listing all these events, and posted that file to pastebin so you can work with (or verify) the raw data.

Zero deltas where Q posts first are most interesting, because this sequence eliminates the possibility of zero deltas arising from someone watching for Trump tweets and then posting in response. If there's a spike at zero delta when Q posts first, that's evidence of Trump choosing when to tweet based on the timing of Q's posts. So for each Q post, I measured the number of seconds between the Q post and the next Trump tweet. Then I put these in one-minute bins (zero delta = Trump tweeted within 60 seconds) and graphed the results.

The number of "zero delta" events (27) is higher than for any other delta on the graph. This is statistical evidence that Q is not a LARP. (If Q were a LARP, you would expect to see random noise in this graph.)

hhttps://pastebin.com/DDPcRLru