Delingpole: Trump Is Right – Renewables Are an Expensive Joke. 3 Mar 2019
“When the wind stops blowing, Let’s hurry. Darling? Darling is the wind blowing today? I’d like to watch television, darling.” President Trump – speech to CPAC 2019
Congratulations President Trump, the first world leader to tell the truth about renewable energy –Trump summed it up.. “in a civilised country you get energy when YOU want it, not when nature (in the form of wind or sunshine) makes the decision for you.”
But Trump’s instincts are perfectly in tune with those of true conservationists ; published in Quillette.
It’s titled “Why Renewables Can’t Save the Planet.” The author, Michael Shellenberger is about as green as they come. In 2003, he helped ‘organize a coalition to “prevent climate change” and create millions of new jobs with a $300 billion dollar investment in renewables.
This project was embraced by Barack Obama: Between 2009–15, the U.S. invested $150 billion dollars in renewables….. The dream turned sour…And who better than the original dream-weaver Shellenberger to tell us why…
Wind and solar take up insane amounts of space: Electricity from solar roofs costs about twice as much as electricity from solar farms, but solar and wind farms require huge amounts of land. That, along with the fact that solar and wind farms require long new transmissions lines, and are opposed by local communities…..
The energy they provide is intermittent and unreliable: When the sun stops shining and the wind stops blowing, you have to quickly be able to ramp up another source of energy.
Contrary to what greenies claim, there is no imminent battery storage solution: Despite what you’ve heard, there is no “battery revolution” on the way, for well-understood technical and economic reasons.
And, no, that hippie idea about pumping water uphill, storing it for later, to run over turbines is never going to fly…For example, California is a world leader when it comes to renewables but we haven’t converted our dams into batteries, partly for geographic reasons. You need the right kind of dam and reservoirs, and even then it’s an expensive retrofit. A bigger problem…
They kill millions of birds (and bats), which greenies like to excuse as being OK because domestic cats kill many more. But actually it’s not OK: What house cats kill are small, common birds, like sparrows, robins and jays. What kills big, threatened, and endangered birds—birds that could go extinct—like hawks, eagles, owls, and condors, are wind turbines.
Solar farms are no better: Building a solar farm is a lot like building any other kind of farm. You have to clear the whole area of wildlife. In order to build one of the biggest solar farms in California the developers hired biologists to pull threatened wildlife… put them on the back of pickup trucks, transport them, and cage them in pens where many ended up dying.
Wind and solar are always doomed to fail because of the laws of physics: In order to produce significant amounts of electricity from weak energy flows, you just have to spread them over enormous areas. In other words, the trouble with renewables isn’t fundamentally technical—it’s natural.
Don’t buy that nonsense about how, thanks to the Chinese, the cost of producing solar panels and wind turbines is coming right down: Consider California. Between 2011–17 the cost of solar panels declined about 75 percent, and yet our electricity prices rose five times more than they did in the rest of the U.S. It’s the same story in Germany… Its electricity prices increased 50 percent between 2006–17, as it scaled up renewables.
Don’t believe that headlines that renewables are dramatically cheaper than nuclear: They are largely an illusion resulting from the fact that 70 to 80 percent of the costs of building nuclear plants are up-front, whereas the costs given for solar and wind don’t include the high cost of transmission lines, new dams, or other forms of battery.
Solar panels are horribly un-eco-friendly – way worse than nuclear: We tend to think of solar panels as clean, but the truth is that there is no plan anywhere to deal with solar panels at the end of their 20 to 25 year….
Oh – and wind turbines kill more people than nuclear plants: See here. If you really care about the environment, Shellenberger argues, then the best answer is nuclear.
And the worst? Renewables: Now that we know that renewables can’t save the planet, are we really going to stand by and let them destroy it?
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/03/true-conservationists-like-trump-hate-renewable-energy/