>>5498914

Thought about this too.

Checked current Military Commission cases and the ones I looked at are entitled USA vs. so-and-so.

Cases brought under state law are not going to be listed in Pacer or tried in federal courts, so eliminate that.

Would Federal whistleblower cases list the whistleblower as plaintiff rather than USA?

That's where my thoughts took me, but did not a lawfag and have not researched the whistleblower statutes or cases.

One more possibility: plaintiff could be US Attorney So-and-So vs. defendants, rather than USA versus…? Or other officer of the United States in their official capacity bringing suit under federal civil (non-criminal) statutes rather than criminal laws?

>>5498932

Q Research does not encourage or condone your "MAGA riots" B.S. Take it somewhere else or better yet just stuff it.

>>5498917

We're happy with our buns. No need to change an established tradition. And hey, it's a shorter word to type. When breads are flyin', short words are gud.

>>5498995

No I typed it myself, just like everything else that I post. Why would you assume that?

>>5499014

No 'i' … yes.

>>5499036

Talk to someone who cares.

>>5499069

This kind of imagery does not help MAGA.

Memeanon not using.

>>5499114

Long, long ago. I made these and I own the memebanks.

>>5499245 TU. Decided to do a few more, seems we need 'em these days.

Grab 'em before they're gone, anons.

Eternal vigilance…

>>5499401 One more. Super-fresh, kek.

<3

>>5499594

I already said … if it's a prosecution under a STATE criminal statute, then it would be tried in a STATE court, not in a federal court. The Pacer system only tracks FEDERAL court cases.