>Too many coincidences now with Q's posts for this to be just another famefag. Nah, it's something different. Far different.
Many are aware of this, but try not to force anons to see the light. As Q said, there are no coincidences. Too many coincidences now to refute with whom you speak of. The shill attacks on here are the best proof of what you stated. Fame? No. An anon who encourages others to believe in themselves and think critically, while never asking for money or trying to get followers (Twatter etc.) does not seek fame.