>>6024234
>Interesting. Have you read Snow Crash? I'm not a tarot guy myself but there are archetypes which are tied to emotional language. These archetypes are captured in drawings and replayed at random. If nothing is truly random and everything is connected, then there is a reasonable relationship between things that shouldn't matter scientifically and things that matter spiritually. Have you read Jung's Synchronicity? Chock full of scientific proofs for things that shouldn't be possible because they are acausally linked. He literally went mad studying this stuff (he focused on horoscopes and the like, principle is the same).
Sorry for the late reply, I got lost in shill ramblings. I'm not familiar with Snow Crash, but I know about Jung. I think that you can't "force" synchronicity like that, it's the Universe's way of telling you things and not the other way round. You have to look for signs that tell you things, and not create them out of some deck of cards. In my book spirituality is only a part of science. If nothing is random and everything is logical, then everything can be researched using the scientific method.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%E2%80%93Wigner_interpretation
>The von Neumann–Wigner interpretation, also described as "consciousness causes collapse [of the wave function]", is an interpretation of quantum mechanics in which consciousness is postulated to be necessary for the completion of the process of quantum measurement.
This should be the baseline for serious physicists. Many have tried to weasel around this, but science doesn't care about opinions. Waveform collapse is done by the observer, the conscious spark of Creation, so the probability wave becomes matter.