>>5504293 (PB Q)
I recall something about the Obama Pres. library's ownership method being relevant here. I think the way "he did it" un-shields it from the typical 5-year doc "protection" period? Am I remembering this correctly?
Fox News article on him today discussing how his votes recently haven' been conservative. I got the feeling (correctly or incorrectly) that it may have been a "comms-y/predictive-programming of sorts" way of suggesting he'll be in the news soon… and [hopefully] out of there for whatever reason works.
Correct. High-ups "in-the-know" KNOW that Q is the real deal… and stating it this directly carries a lot of weight.
Anyone ever notice that "DECLAS" reversed spells "SALCED"… very close to "SAUCED"… and the only wrong letter has the same number value as the right letter does:
L=12=1+2=3
U=21=2+1=3
And if the DECLAS documents confirm Q's claims, those claims will INDEED be "SAUCED".
Thanks anon. Saved us a step.
post ending '76' Ha!