>>5502835 (/pb)
>>5503398 (/pb)
>>5503493 (/pb) - Q Post
Sorry if this connection has been made already, I haven't seen this explained up on the board yet though. Q keeps talking about the "game theory" because they're trying to tell us the tactics they employ. It's all about controlling your enemies' moves. What's the best way to do that? You make them THINK they have an advantage, where they really have none. You make a bad move LOOK like a good move.
Think about the "Scaramucci model" through the same lens. If you know your enemy is constantly trying to comp/build a case against every nominee you choose, then you can expect that all of the obvious choices may be traps. Remember all of the articles back when Scaramucci was first hired? No one expected it, it completely took the cabal by surprise! So all the prep work the deep state had done trying to juice things up for Trump?… GONE! They weren't prepared. Gave them quite a spook didn't it?
When Q says the "Scaramucci model" I believe they are talking about a combination of making a quick/unexpected pick + having them do what they need w/o optics being an issue. Temps are temps, if the media successfully raises the heat all you have to do is bring in the real nominee. Notice how Trump never gives any sort of timeline about when he's going to make a pick? And he ALWAYS waits as long as possible to publicly announce his nominees.
I can just imagine these criminals biting their nails in a room discussing who they need to worry about, kek