Darnkess

>>544247

Anons, has anybody noticed this before? I've posted this question twice with no response.

After searching for "darnkess" on duckduckgo, I found this video. It was posted Jan 10th, but it's part of a series of podcasts put out by

< https:// x22report. com

This is probably the best website I've seen on these matters. The article on November 5 (day of Q's post) is episode 1417, entitled "Something Big Is Happening That Hasn't Happened Since 2011"

< https:// x22report. com/something-big-is-happening-that-hasnt-happened-since-2011-episode-1417/

That episode links to a story about a FOIA document that revealed that the FBI was investigating Clinton back on '15 for the email server, and sent out notices to preserve information to " the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Dept. of Treasury, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI James Clapper), The National Counter Terrorism Center, and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)…Five days after the initial request, the same FBI agent sent another round of notifications to the same agencies, adding the National Security Agency (NSA) and the U.S. Secret Service (USSS). The next day, September 3rd, 2015, three more agencies were added to the preservation request: The CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Department of Defense (DOD). At this point, every single member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which signed off on the Uranium One deal was served with a notice to preserve records."

<https:// www.zerohedge. com/news/2017-11-05/new-foia-documents-reveal-fbi-scramble-preserve-cfius-records-uranium-one-scandal?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29

>>551485

Thank you. I've wasted hours of researching because nobody would respond. I wasn't reading the research posts back then, only Q's posts.

With over 1000 threads, it's tedious to figure out what was found where. I don't know how long it's going to take to get searchability, but I may try to make an index of major terms that appear in each thread.

>>551519

Noted. It's difficult to go back and research things that we've missed, as people keep changing the names of their media, websites, etc. to draw traffic. As far as I am concerned, they are traitors to the cause because they muddy the waters.