>>551249 This could be a great tool if someone commits to completing the entire Q drop this way. The bridge is a good option even if it's not what Q was suggesting with his BRIDGE crumb.
>>551376 It's rule 1+++
We need to have some level of consistency in our methodology. We are being asked to get more organized and the we gather, analyze, and present this Intel is vital to our success. Not to mention TIME saved by not recreating work that's already been done.
Qresearch Expansion
It's insane how often I get on this board and read shit that has already been dug into previously. Same theory and/or sources repeated months later.
I guess it makes sense now that we have over a million posts between POL, CBTS, STORM, QResearch + GA, and the dozen alt boards. Not to mention the research on Reddit, Steemit, Twitter, FB, GLP, YT, and other random blogs.
This is an enormous amount of information to process and validate. It's remarkable how much has been archived and organized by anons.
< That being said it's really a good idea to get more organized with research into specific topics to ensure we don't have anons wasting time on topics that are already covered.
One suggestion is for you to use validated tools to research these topics. There are many options but one I've used is:
SPIDER
Qualitative evidence synthesis
S Sample
PI Phenomenon of Interest
D Design
E Evaluation
R Research type
This is /QResearch/ and we need to elevate our process in order to organize evidence and develop these theories into more significant/succinct Intel.