>>5515906

Thank you. But someone said there is a missing post to my ARACHNE thread. Someone else said to post the whole thing again.

BAKER please advise before I continue, because I have much MOAR.

>>5515931

No butcher, NO BAKER, no candlestick maker?

kek

I will wait for a BAKER and repost. My internet connection is sporadic do to weather anywayz.

>>5515965

Q said:

P-A-N-I-C

Patriots in Control.

In context of ARACHNE SENDS HER REGARDS, "P-A-N-I-C" would mean:

Paladists/Palladium Is NOT In Control.

Patriots in Control.

See below:

>>5515906

>>5516015

Correct. There are 17 different Intelligence Agencies, thus the "Q" Security Clearance and Q.

>>5516020

Shut the fuck up. That is exactly what it means.

>>5516023

>>5516039

I don't know how to do that. If you or someone can explain it to me, I would be glad to do it.

I already tried to screen cap the file from my word processor, but that didn't work.

No need to apologize though, fren.

I took your comment as a request.

>>5516066

You said: "There are more than 38 or more levels of security clearance."

I didn't say there are 17 levels of security clearance, I said that Q Clearance represents the Security Clearance over ALL 17 Intelligence Agencies, and as everyone knows,

Q = 17.

>>5516092

kek

I meant my word/text program>Open Office.

Or maybe I am a time traveler, and work for PLVS VLTRA. kekiddykek

>>5516109

I posted the 5 part TLDR on #7051. Labeled NOTABLE, but it got lost by the baker.

Another anon posted four parts of it here:

>>5515906

I see there is a new baker.

BAKER:

Should I just repost the whole thing?

>>5515906

Thread is not complete, it is missing a post. Go to the original and find the rest. I appreciate the NOTABLE, but the baker of #7051 dropped the ball, and the baker of this thread ghosted.

It has been suggested that I should repost the whole thing. So I will repost the thread in its entirety, and hopefully the WHOLE thread will be "reNOTABLE". I am not going to waste time posting MOAR on this subject until it can be accurately linked back to a WHOLE, original thread.

The new information I have to add, will make no sense unless the readers/anons have access to go back to read my "ARACHNE SENDS HER REGARDS" thread in its entirety.

If the new BAKER has a better idea, please advise.

Also, someone asked for a JPG of the whole thread, but I don't know how to do that.

If another anon has that ability, please do so.