>>5516589

Q is probably connected to NSA/Nat sec/Military

I don't remember it being stated anyplace, and certainly never by Q, that Q (Whoever they are) is all-knowing. Their religious preference does not determine mine whatsoever.

As far as America is concerned, there are varying forces for dominion in the country. Satanism and it's sects is one, Christianity and it's sects is another.

Like the analogy of two fighting wolves, which prevails? The one you feed more.

Even if you weren't a Christian, in your war against Satanists, Christians become your logical ally.

I don't want everyone to become fundamentalist, hell, I associate fundamentalism with Satanism…

But…I can understand that in this spiritual war the forces of light have been trying to bolster the Christian forces, check out all the Jesus themed magazines near checkout lanes showing up.

Does this happen organically?

The religious/spiritual great awakening is likely reserved for after the arrests/prosperity can take place

>>5516701

Yeah, I've heard that expression before.

>>5516733

gasp Q?

Arrest it?

>>5516751

You must be kidding or a mental infant.

That sort of classified material is not the kind of thing you can post online and stay out of prison.

>>5516775

Yeah, there have been authorized leaks (I believe) or leaks out of profound necessity to show egregious crimes…

But it's wrong to petition people to violate clearances

>>5516785

Double slit experiment demonstrates non-locality of wave-function. What this really shows is that energies that don't interact with the higgs-field are mass-less and mass-less energies have non-local qualities.

You know what, fuck it, just read your Bible and go to Church.

>>5516802

HAHAHAHAHA

You're great.

It's like the movie Idiocracy has live actors out in the real world, keeping the experience going

>>5516822

Ah yes, equivocal synonyms. Wonderful.

However, the leap from double slit to GOD IS GREAT is what you call a "quantum leap" in logic

>>5516838

Are you on a mission to parody Christians and make them look foolish?

I mean seriously, are you going to mock and deride someone for having a vocabulary?

Do you know what confirmation bias is?

I suppose the job of science is to confirm the Bible.

Thank God you're not in charge of something important.

>>5516838

>>5516860

The video is quite nice, my chastisement is meant for the person who keeps attacking reason