>>552129 (last bread)
>Interesting discourse among anons who frequent a board where the chief sponsor is a Japanese ( can't say it ) manufacturer
1) adblockers work
2) not here for the sponsors & what they're selling, don't need it
3) still disgusted by fake tits on the internet and IRL, regardless to an anon opinion above
4) BAc to Q research, the actual reason that I'm here
I hear you, and it's relatively reasonable, I don't take things on face value either, I DO face the value of what's in front of me though. Things will shift, in our favor for now, ideally for later, but guess who's job THAT is? WE, THE PEOPLE. Concerned? Focus your energy on doing what needs be done as a citizen who OWNS the government. Re_read the Constitution & Amendments. Read the Federalist Papers also, along with other writings by the Founding Fathers.
We'll see how this swamp drain goes, and how AT&T + other corps act A) while POTUS is remains in office, and B) once POTUS is out of office. Oh, and 0 gain, it's OUR duty to wrest control back to OUR hands. Part of the reason why we're here is to remember HOW to do just that, be educated citizens instead of concerned victims.
Have anons figured out yet the the IBOR is NOT about AT&T? AT&T proposed something that could be used to our long-term benefit. Matters not who the messenger was, whether we like/trust them or not, did we get the message? Message, is, an Internet Bill of Rights, introduced by Congress, would be beneficial if passed, and enforced. For now, we push the idea out there to the public, and we all win if it goes through, no matter what AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, etc. do or don't do. It's not that complicated.
Fucking idiots
OR…
Beanz & those like her, even on this board, are intentionally taking advantage of the fact that some people really DON'T know the difference between a right and a regulation, that a Bill of Rights is NOT government control or regulation. Key word: RIGHTS. How people are missing this, is beyond me
OR…
She took what Q said personally, and this is simply an admission of guilt.
Not quite relevant to the issue. Rights are rights, no matter who suggests them. in this case, Randall Stephenson is either a Patriot, or a traitor. Being the EO of AT&T doesn't make him an inheritor of the company's past misdeeds. If you were CEO, and made the suggestion, I'd think the same.
Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are not national, not global. Same with an IBOR, created by and for Americans.
On the right road, & in the right lane, Don't swerve for the fearful.
I think the Idea is for WE THE PEOPLE to write it. how to submit it to Congress, that's not my area of expertise, tbh. Another anon has that answer.
My point PRECISELY, government doesn't give rights, it has a duty to protect rights.
If that's the case,
>What I say a class action lawsuit?
>When is it effective?
reflection of the sun through a thigh gap. if you see a rod, you're on your own & alone on that one
Logical thinking. I can get used to seeing moar of it.
>TRUST Adm R.
>He played the game to remain in control.
>Adm R/ No Such Agency (W&W) + POTUS/USMIL =
>Apply the Keystone.
>Paint the picture.
>I interpret this as Q/AT&T’s effort for us to push Congress and the President, to codify into law protection (with clear guidance and rules) for the major telecoms to operate in the fashion as described in their consumer release. In my opinion, they are advocating for an open internet, only without fear from any Government/Intelligence Agency for having done so. Sounds like a positive thing the way I interpret it.