>>552229

Look at that cunt glow, hurts my eyes

>>552247

Someone with a Twatter needs to tell that cunt to sit down and shut her fucking cum trap, the adults are working

>>552255

Net Neutrality was never about our constitutional rights. Internet Bill of Rights is something that would forward our core God given rights under the constitution to the Internet. Apparently unless you are a conservative baker in bum fuck and you got a pretty mouth USA, private companies are free to violate constitutional law.

>>552378

its not a new grant, it is a forward. Basically saying that the Internet is not some zone exempt from the constitution.

>>552398

No way, the Internet is regulated at the country level. That is how globalization ins business works. If I want to do business in another country i need to abide by their laws.

>>552409

The same people that administer the Biil of Rights in our Constitution. IBOR should NOT be anything new, it should be a forward to our already enforced BOR.

>>552429

Many have tried, the storage costs alone damn new bankrupted Vid.me not even considering the compensation model nightmare. This is not a traditional business environment where a market disruptor can just spin up and compete.

The issue that IBOR would solve is the notion that since social media is operated by private companies that they are exempt from the BOR and can censor you. The IBOR would simply forward our already possessed rights under the consitution of these United States to all entities.

There is already legal precedent to do so courtesy of these stupid fag liberals. They forced a small bakery out of business for violating the rights of a gay couple. Those rights that they supposedly violated are granted by the BOR. So with that precedent set, it is not a far leap at all for the US Government to extend the coverage area of our current BOR to the Internet. No new fucking regulations, no new agency to monitor, the same shit we have just enforced on the Internet.

>>552471

Exactly how it is enforced in China, the companies are audited. This is nothing new, I am a software architect and deal with this every day of my life.

>>552510

Why are you still shit posting name faggot? Do you have anything of value to share?

>>552500

you are right, that is what I am trying to say as well. The BOR already does what people are asking for in the IBOR. My thought is that you take away the ability for a private company to violate the rights of people like they already set the precedent for with the bakers and the homo cake.

>>552590

Case law is bullshit. Laws are acts of government not some fucking judge deciding to set a legal precedent. This is exactly why the founding fathers tried to prevent lawyers from holding government office.

>>552600

"If not, then the point is moot, a company or government can operate outside the usa and record and do whatever they want."

this is not true, ask Facebook what it is like being a US based company doing business in China.

>552627

I saw a BO post so I would like to know why this namefagging, shit posting shit is being allowed to continue.