They were acting as part of a conspiracy to aid NK, which is still our wartime enemy. (The Korean War ended with an armistice, not a permanent end of war. The Clowns really should have fixed that; it's the reason MI was and is able to spy on them and rout their backsides.)
>Where is she getting government control from a bill of rights???
From Clown FUD. Admittedly, I wouldn't have trusted any previous administration to ensure that an IBOR was beneficial or enforced in a beneficial manner; but, Trump is a good guy, even on 2A (contrary to what the demoralization shills say).
>We mention thinking maps - which 100% fits Q's instructions, and get immediate push back.
You're welcome to do link analysis, but (a) that's not what Q meant by "Expand your thinking.", and (b) the network is too big to assemble the whole thing usefully that way.
Hey Q, rather than waiting for IBOR, use the existing laws against the enemy. For example, Twitter has not only refused to ban users who post child pornography, but banned the users who reported CP. That means not only are Twitter's domain name, trademarks, software, patents, and other "intellectual property" being used to commit a crime, but so are the datacenters, servers, cables, peering rights, and all other infrastructure they're using to operate their service.
ASSET FORFEITURE TIME.
All Twitter's hardware are belong to US.
Charlottesville 2.0, now with more death.
>#3 covered by your wallet, governement shall not have the power to hand out tech they didn't produce, that's wealth redistribution.
Government currently enforces patents and copyrights on behalf of the Clowns (and previously NSA) to prevent us from having the latest software-based technology. Government-enforced monopolies and Clown saboteurs prevent us from having nice things like IPv6 and bug-free operating systems.
>#4 covered by a different ISP that doesn't do that.
Broadband is a natural monopoly, just like the television service provided over the same cables, and needs to be regulated as a utility.
But they're over-the-top freaked out about this one.
My point is that NSA are the good guys; NSA can't legally advocate for IBOR itself; Q is associated with NSA and MI, but somehow permitted to advocate for policy changes here; AT&T has acted on behalf of NSA before; therefore, AT&T is acting as a front for NSA (and the Patriots) in pushing for IBOR.
Trump won't let a bad bill get through.
>The 1st Amendment is there to protect us from Government Interference in our right to Free Speech! Never was intended to apply to private individuals or companies!
Private companies were never intended to have the powers that Big CIA-Funded Social have been given by the government, including the power to use patents on obvious, trivial algorithms to destroy their competitors.
(a) Currently, Twitter et al. are legally considered to be private entities, despite the CIA's hand sticking up their digestive tract to operate their mouthparts. Therefore, the courts won't apply BOR to them. The IBOR would work around the legal fiction that Big Clown Social is private.
(b) IBOR should also deal with patent abuse/trolling and other sabotage by Clowns and commercial crooks.
Gab is run by a fool (likely vulnerable to Clown coercion, if not a Clown himself), and their company will be put out of business very quickly if the Clowns want it gone.