I don't see how this can be something specific to the US Congress - seems it would have to be a global agreement?
That's one reason I'm suspect - may be more globalism in sheep's clothing
I see your point and appreciate the comment, but the structure/protocol of internet traffic doesn't limit it to One country - if the US passes internet "law", are you saying that no traffic could pass through without following the law? No severs could be housed in the US without following the law? pardon my ignorance but I can't envision how this could possibly be enforced.
What makes more sense is to regulate any US companies offering internet services/products - but what would prevent them from moving hdqtrs to another country that didn't enforce the same laws?
> at least some basic outline of a proposal, and then I'll decide whether or not to cheer-lead it to the public.
^THIS
I may be full of shite, but I can't recall a Q post where the IBOR was actually Endorsed - pointed to, yes…but never specifically supported?
The "Hate Index" is an AI program by the ADL/UC Berkley (Janet Napolitano). Is it possible that this is what we should research - the algos Behind the censoring?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lULmie51-pU