Anonymous ID: 532ee5 March 5, 2019, 11:41 a.m. No.5522168   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2188 >>2307

>>5522026 lb

Rand has been shot and beat by his own actions.

  1. He vowed to filibuster the 702 FISA renewal's. Didn't do it.

  2. He preached for days about getting out of wars. Time came for him to vote. He declined to vote to end the wars. WTF?

  3. Blocks Potus attempt to secure our borders, which Potus has every legal authority to do. Did not raise a stinking finger to block Obama's illegal OE's. Where were his "prinicipals" when Obama used multiple EO's to fund BILLIONS of our dollars on FORIEGN WALLS?

 

He's a traitor.

 

>>5521946 lb

Rand isn't listening to the many logical explanations being tweeted to him. Anons need to get over idol worship and look at actions instead of words.

Anonymous ID: 532ee5 March 5, 2019, 11:50 a.m. No.5522294   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2320

>>5522203

Because he is refusing to back the necessary funding for our border wall. His "principles" are skewed. He knows there is no other way to get funding for a wall. He can get off his principals and do what's right for this country.

Anonymous ID: 532ee5 March 5, 2019, 11:57 a.m. No.5522375   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2433

>>5522098

Agreed. Not only calls out Dems, but also RINO R's. In fact, the bill to bring our troops home and offically end the wars is being used in much the same way. Potus doesn't need Congress approval to end a war. But what it showed was all the neocons still in Congress. There are only 3 Senators I will support going forward. They are the only 3 who voted yay. Paul was not one of them.

Anonymous ID: 532ee5 March 5, 2019, 12:11 p.m. No.5522552   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5522307

Is the fact he refused to vote proof enough for you? I can't paste the vote cuz already pasted this bread. Look for it. Then STFU

 

As of now, I have never once claimed Paul holds the future of anything. Put words in my mouth to prove your argument? Nice tactic. Doesn't work tho.

I did not bring Paul into a conversation. He is being highlighted because he put himself in the mix by advocating for voting against funding for a damn wall. He can get off his principles and take a stand to do what is right for this country. His arguments are not sound.

 

>we're going to win, whether you like it or not.

you really are an idiot.

 

Don't bother replying cuz your filtered. Have not desire to waste more time with your assumptions.