>>5522901

>Can't argue with Christian deconstructionists inspired (unwittingly) by Frankfurt school of socialists and other luciferians.

the point that you are responding to has exactly no fucking relationship at all to the Frankfurt school.

(((your))) criticisms of christianity are fucking fake.

sure, critical theory had an impact on 20th century christianity. primarily via B B Warfield who spent time in germany and was very interested in higher critical theory. he took that shit back to princeton and it infected much of christianity.

but it hasnt anything at all to do with the virgin birth directly.

it has to do with radicalizing how texts are interpreted. the result has been a false dichotomy between the fundies that want a strictly literal hermenuetic and progs that want pure metaphor. these i would agree are control mechanisms.

there is a middle path (just like the one we are following politically at the moment - neither D nor R). its an augustinian path and that approach to interpretation avoids all the bullshit.

read moar shill.

>>5523059

>Cisco Umbrella <<<

>

>Blocking access to 8ch [not just qresearch]

the Cisco block was put into place internally within Cisco Dec 2017 / Jan 2018. i remember cuz we was busy with RTM shit at the time here.

>>5523104

>Jews cannot distinguish born again Christians from Catholics, and lump everyone into the "Jew hating Christkilling Catholic" pile.

i give no fucks what (((they))) can and cannot distinguish. and am at a loss to understand why i would.

and am not interested SBC propoganda. God knows i had enough of it as a kid. the "born again" process ritual is just another control mechanism that is used to sow division. this anon is pretty sure that he will run into a diverse range of folk in heaven that is likely to include some RCs, some orthodox, some fundies and God knows who else. no problem with the born again analogy - it was how Christ presented things to nicodemus. but there are other paths described in the text and i see no reason to exalt the born again, sinner's prayer on a tract in a toilet process approach at the expense of the others (say Acts 16:32 for example, where salvation sounds almost corporate for a family as opposed to personal).

>5523323

>Nope. Being born again is the only thing that can change you from your current dead status to eternal life.

acts 16:30-32

30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must I do to be saved?

31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.

32 And they spake unto him the word of the Lord, and to all that were in his house

and now you need a hermenuetic in order to defend your preffered SBC approach - but (((you))) are clearly not in a position to defend your hermenuetic or any other for that matter. take your division tactics somewhere else.