dChan
Anonymous ID: 985ee8 March 5, 2019, 12:30 p.m. No.5522801   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3050 >>3149 >>3165

Q: The Basics - An Introduction to Q and the Great Awakening

PDF: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3082784.html#3082809

 

^Is this a good introduction to Q?

Is it "the basics"?

Will it help the public to understand what is going on, or make it more confusing, more intimidating, and less appealing?

What qualities would a good introduction have?

How do we know?

Did this get discussed?

Did the COMMUNITY make this?

Or did some "anon" just put it up and say "here it is".

And then there it was at the top of the board, claming to be "the basics"– when in fact it is very CONVOLUTED.

And it our "the basics" docs are CONVOLUTED, does THAT fact play into any MSM narratives about "Qanon"?

About "the chans"?

About weird, confusing, obscure things that normies flee from?

How do you control this movement?

CO-OPT everything, and SUBTLY undermine every place you can?

While maintaining a degree of plausibility?

WHO made "the basics" of Q?

How do we know?

It was NOT made by the community.

The videos the board pushes were NOT made by the community.

The images that appear as banners were NOT made by the community.

The community had no input in the creative process.

And we have no idea who or what the "anons" that produce content and push it out to us are.

We just passively accept that "anons" do all this stuff here.

But is organic?

It is ALL subtly undermining.

And not-so-subtly controlling narrative…

Anonymous ID: 985ee8 March 5, 2019, 12:32 p.m. No.5522823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2837

Look at these.

What do they convey?

Are we being MOCKED, here?

Really, are you kidding me?

Look.

Where do they come from?

Why doesn't the COMMUNITY create the images?

It doesn't

Where do they come from?

Do patriots question this?

Do patriots think for themselves, especially when it is obvious something is amiss?

Or not?

 

[INTERNAL CIVIL WAR]

control of NARRATIVE (control over you).

>(control over you)

 

We are the news– but we don't have control HERE

Hence, we have not done our job of CHANGING THE PUBLIC NARRATIVE.

FIGHT, PEOPLE

Anonymous ID: 985ee8 March 5, 2019, 12:32 p.m. No.5522837   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2847 >>2876 >>2968

>>5522823

Look closely

What does this convey?

What does it REALLY convey?

What is the body language?

What does IT portray?

Does it sneak in something different from what you THOUGHT the meme meant?

Look at it.

UNDERMINING us?

Who makes these?

Why do they all play these sneaky undermining games?

Do patriots ever wake up here?

Do it!

Wake up PEOPLE!

Anonymous ID: 985ee8 March 5, 2019, 12:33 p.m. No.5522850   🗄️.is 🔗kun

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

 

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

 

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

 

 

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

 

AND YET.

 

Here, we (seemingly) imitate fake-seeming posts from 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

 

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

 

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

Is this board controlled in the same way 4chan is?

Where does it all come from?

Who is pulling the strings on fake chans?

 

Everything is infiltrated

 

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

 

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

 

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

 

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

 

How could this be?