I say this as someone sitting on the sidelines:

I'm still waiting on someone to create a very clear and concise infograph that shows why Q is legit and why he should be taken seriously.

He posts in a similar format to so many of the larpers that came before him and so for people to take him seriously there needs to be clear evidence as to why his posts are important.

I don't know anything about crumbs or maps or whatever, I'm not following it that closely. All I know is that there is some guy alleging to be some type of insider who makes vague posts on imageboards that may or may not be important and legitimate. If the posts are legitimate and real, then it should be easy to demonstrate right? Why is this huge movement able to exist without evidence as to the legitimacy of Q, and if that evidence exists, then where is it? There seems to be so much hyperbolic and irrelevant noise-making and Q-posting on this board and not enough sharing of simple facts and hard proofs.

Why am I bringing this up? Because I want to be spoonfeed? No.

I bring this up because I am absolutely certain that there are hordes of people just like me who would be willing to pay much more attention if such a thing was delivered and the validity of Q was clearly shown in a simple and easily digestible manner.