I don't like to refer to Q in posts. It seems too cultish, and kept me away for a long time. The Q phenomenon was a long time gaining my confidence, more time than I would expect any normal person to take.

Also how much of techniques given here serve to identify and immediately discredit us? Referring to Q categorizes us.

George Washington, Rules for Civility

79th) Be not apt to relate News if you know not the truth thereof. In Discoursing of things you Have heard Name not your Author always A Secret Discover not.

http:// www.history.org/Almanack/life/manners/rules2.cfm

>>247836

This also, the reach for trending hashtags. I don't even try, though we should all have different techniques. Include a hashtag and we are immediately searchable.

People have been so saturated with political trolling that they look only for what confirms their biases. I am to the point I think of every lefty poster as a Shareb… troll.

Print media could work as well, dropping off and posting leaflets.

On a long guardrail between traffic and pedestrian traffic in Seattle, covered with nonsense magic marker tagging, I saw one coherent message and remembered it:

>Pizzagate is real

>>395797

Those despair shills…

Q is gaining people, like me, and I'm smart as hell and have read the sequence of Q posts from the beginning. Now on page 55 of the mkultra financing Congressional testimony.

A lot of the Q material resonates because people have been talking about it for ever. Before there never seemed to be a thing that could be done about it, that we were stuck watching freedom slip away. But now that has changed. It is vital that the material Q points to be understood and we be able to voice it in our own words. The people who related it to me are very old by now, whatever comes of this, we must be prepared to be the old wise storytellers for a new generation.

This is a very old war, be a storyteller, the magician incarnate…